•   Advanced Web Design workshop IM00DU28-3001 22.03.2022-10.05.2022  5 cr  (19MEDIAART, ...) +-
    Learning outcomes of the course unit
    The students are able to:
    - use up to date web design techniques, tools and working methods
    - deepen their professional identity as web designers or developers
    Prerequisites and co-requisites
    Basics of the subject
    Course contents
    Advanced web design and programming
    Assessment criteria
    Satisfactory

    TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:



    https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

    Good

    TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:



    https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

    Excellent

    TAMK's general instruction for grading will be applied and details agreed at the beginning of course implementation:



    https://intra.tamk.fi/web/tutkinto-opinto-opas/arviointi

    Name of lecturer(s)

    Antti Perälä

    Recommended or required reading

    Digital resources

    Planned learning activities and teaching methods

    Online-lessons

    Assessment methods and criteria

    Course work

    Language of instruction

    English

    Timing

    22.03.2022 - 10.05.2022

    Registration

    11.12.2021 - 21.03.2022

    Credits

    5 cr

    Group(s)

    19MEDIAART

    21MEDIAART

    20MEDIAART

    18MEDIAART

    Seats

    15 - 30

    Teacher(s)

    Ari Närhi, Antti Perälä, Eetu Eskelinen

    Unit, in charge

    Media and Arts

    Degree programme(s)

    Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts

    Office

    TAMK Mediapolis

    R&D proportion

    1 cr

    Virtual proportion

    5 cr

    Evaluation scale

    0-5

    Students use of time and load

    27 x 5 h

    Assessment criteria
    Not approved

    0 = not approved; less than half of the required work performed; clear misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

    Satisfactory

    1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

    2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

    Good

    3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

    4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

    Excellent

    5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).