•   Advanced 3D Workshop IM00DS76-3003 01.03.2022-28.05.2022  5 cr  (19MEDIAART, ...) +-
    Learning outcomes of the course unit
    Students can describe up to date 3D modeling techniques, tools and working methods. They are able to examine upcoming working methods and tools. After the course they have been experimenting some of the new 3D techniques in a customer project or as a team. They can review and argue how 3D modeling is going to change in next 10 years.
    Course contents
    New and upcoming 3D modelling techniques, experimental 3D modelling.
    Assessment criteria
    Satisfactory

    The student can describe up to date and future 3D modeling techniques, tools and working methods.

    The student can describe how to research new 3D modeling techniques.

    Good

    The student can experiment new 3D modelling techniques in a real-life project.

    The student can create 3D models with new modelling techniques.

    Excellent

    The student can apply learned skills to research upcoming techniques in the field of 3D modeling.

    The student can apply learned skills to compare new techniques for 3D modeling.

    Further information
    For Games Academy students.
    Name of lecturer(s)

    Antti Perälä

    Recommended or required reading

    Digital resources

    Planned learning activities and teaching methods

    Online lectures and independent exercises

    Assessment methods and criteria

    Course work project + student activity

    Language of instruction

    English

    Timing

    01.03.2022 - 28.05.2022

    Registration

    01.12.2021 - 10.03.2022

    Credits

    5 cr

    Group(s)

    19MEDIAART

    20TIKOGAME

    20MEDIAART

    Seats

    15 - 30

    Teacher(s)

    Media-and-Arts Virtuaalihenkilö, Antti Perälä

    Unit, in charge

    Media and Arts

    Degree programme(s)

    Degree Programme in Business Information Systems, Bachelor's Degree Programme in Media and Arts

    Office

    TAMK Main Campus

    Virtual proportion

    2 cr

    Evaluation scale

    0-5

    Students use of time and load

    5 x 27 h

    Assessment criteria
    Satisfactory

    1 = approved; more than half of the required work performed; some misunderstandings in rendering the tasks; attendance level low; little to no interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

    2 = satisfactory; more than half of the required work succesfully performed; quality of work below average; attendance level low or average; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

    Good

    3 = good; all course work performed; quality of work decent; attendance level good; some interactivity between peers and teacher(s)

    4 = very good; all work performed and submitted correctly in due time; quality of work good; attendance level good; a lot of good quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).

    Excellent

    5 = excellent; all work performed in an outstanding way and submitted on schedule; high attendance; a lot of high quality interactivity between peers and teacher(s).