Students are able to:
- find cost information in a complex technology environment
- calculate costs in a complex technology environment
- calculate also value network costs and seek optimal cost level
- determine strategic indicators
Please select the curriculum by the start year of studies and orientation line.
Student will achieve the minimum acceptable level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report (portfolio) includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess basic knowledge & skills, parallelly presenting and emphasizing information relevant to objectives / students have also proven that they possess a wide range of information regarding course's topics / contents (Bloom's taxonomy level 1) and that they also understand the meaning of all the possessed information (Bloom's taxonomy level 2)
Student will achieve this level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess good knowledge & skills, parallelly combining already existing, original material with by themselves provided, value-adding information or knowledge / students have also proven that are (in addition to Bloom's levels 1 and 2) capable of applying all the acquired knowledge in to them relevant, working life situations (Bloom's taxonomy level 3) and that they are capable of analysing, breaking information into sub-parts and drawing conclusions based on this data (Bloom's taxonomy level 4)
Student will achieve this level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess exceptional knowledge & skills, parallelly combining already existing, original material with by themselves provided, value-adding information or knowledge in such a manner that this process will provide entirely new information (deductions, implications, applications, discoveries, summaries) /students have proven that they master all the earlier described Bloom's taxonomy levels (1-4) and are additionally capable of innovating and differentiating in their work all the acquired knowledge (Bloom's taxonomy level 5) - The highest level possible to acquire is Bloom's taxonomy level 6 which is to state that learner has obtained the highest level maturity possible - meaning that the learner can also critically observe his or hers learning process's outcomes and is autonomically capable of enhancing his or hers cognitive mental schemas, further to enhance learning efficiency
Matti Kivimäki
Finnish
31.08.2019 - 07.03.2020
02.07.2019 - 31.07.2019
5 cr
19YTJ
Matti Kivimäki
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Student will achieve the minimum acceptable level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report (portfolio) includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess basic knowledge & skills, parallelly presenting and emphasizing information relevant to objectives / students have also proven that they possess a wide range of information regarding course's topics / contents (Bloom's taxonomy level 1) and that they also understand the meaning of all the possessed information (Bloom's taxonomy level 2)
Student will achieve this level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess good knowledge & skills, parallelly combining already existing, original material with by themselves provided, value-adding information or knowledge / students have also proven that are (in addition to Bloom's levels 1 and 2) capable of applying all the acquired knowledge in to them relevant, working life situations (Bloom's taxonomy level 3) and that they are capable of analysing, breaking information into sub-parts and drawing conclusions based on this data (Bloom's taxonomy level 4)
Student will achieve this level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess exceptional knowledge & skills, parallelly combining already existing, original material with by themselves provided, value-adding information or knowledge in such a manner that this process will provide entirely new information (deductions, implications, applications, discoveries, summaries) /students have proven that they master all the earlier described Bloom's taxonomy levels (1-4) and are additionally capable of innovating and differentiating in their work all the acquired knowledge (Bloom's taxonomy level 5) - The highest level possible to acquire is Bloom's taxonomy level 6 which is to state that learner has obtained the highest level maturity possible - meaning that the learner can also critically observe his or hers learning process's outcomes and is autonomically capable of enhancing his or hers cognitive mental schemas, further to enhance learning efficiency
Students recognize the basic principles of general contract law.
Students understand basic differences in contract law between different legal cultures (eg civil law versus common law) and dispute resolution (eg national court vs. arbitration)
The student has made and presented his report on the subject closely.
The student has completed the sales part of the course and challenging negotiating situations and the main features of international project activities.
The student understands the basic principles of general contract law.
The student understands the fundamental differences in contract law between different legal cultures (eg civil law versus common law) and dispute resolution (eg national court vs. arbitration) and is able to apply the lessons learned in working life and working in an international environment.
The student has made and presented a report on the subject, which has a clear working life connection and / or connection with the international operating environment.
The student has completed the sales part of the course and challenging negotiating situations and the main features of international project activities.
The student understands the key principles of general contract law.
The student understands the fundamental differences in contract law between different legal cultures (eg civil law versus common law) and dispute resolution (eg national court versus arbitration) and is able to apply the lessons learned in working life and in an international environment.
The student has made and presented a report on the subject, which has a clear working life connection and a connection to the international operating environment. In addition, the report is interesting and provides clear added value to other students.
The student has completed the sales part of the course and challenging negotiating situations and the main features of international project activities.
Marko Mäkilouko
Finnish
English
18.01.2020 - 08.05.2020
02.12.2019 - 31.12.2019
5 cr
19YTJ
Jarmo Koivuniemi, Minna Heikinheimo, Marko Mäkilouko
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her.
Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her. Student has generated a model to improve his or hers international know how.
Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her. Student has generated a model to improve his or hers international know how. Student can lead workers with different cultural background and organize while observing cultural differences. Student can create motivation, commitment and trust in an international project.
Marko Mäkilouko
Finnish
31.08.2019 - 09.11.2019
02.07.2019 - 08.09.2019
5 cr
19YTJ
Marko Mäkilouko
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
According to University's common thesis criteria.
According to University's common thesis criteria.
According to University's common thesis criteria.
Marko Mäkilouko
Finnish
01.08.2019 - 31.07.2020
02.07.2019 - 31.07.2019
30 cr
19YTJ
Päivi Mayor, Hanna Pihlajarinne, Pauliina Paukkala, Mika Ijas, Henri Salonen, Anne Kasari, Helena Lintunen, Hanna Pihlajarinne, Pasi Airikka, Jari Ruokolainen, Marja-Liisa Timperi, Matti Kivimäki, Ville Haapakangas, Marko Mäkilouko, Antti Perttula, Tero Markkanen
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
30 cr
10 cr
0-5
The student has a first understanding of how to lead experts in technology organizations. The participant is able to list the key areas of leadership, but is unable to apply them to his / her own work or previous experience, or to solve challenging managerial situations.
The student has a clear understanding of leading the experts in technology organizations. The participant is able to list the key areas of leadership and is able to apply them to some extent to their own work or previous experiences and to solving challenging managerial situations.
The student has an excellent understanding of leading the experts in technology organizations. The participant is able to apply and further develop the key areas of leadership in both his own work and solving challenging managerial situations with others. The participant is able to reflect on his / her own activities and skills in a versatile way, and develop his / her own activities from the management perspective.
Suositeltava materiaali annetaan luennoilla. (not translated)
- Interaktiiviset luennot
- Opiskelijaryhmien itse järjestäjät vierailijat tai osaamisen jakaminen
- Avoin kirja ryhmätentti
- Kirjallisuuden lukeminen ja oman Johtamisen Käsikirjan laatiminen (not translated)
Hyvän Johtamisen Käsikirja
Arviointi: Hyväksytty / Hylätty
- Kurssin sisältöjen mukainen
- Vastaa erityisesti omiin kysymyksiin ja tarpeisiin
- Materiaali: Suositellut kirjat, lähiopetus, kalvot, keskustelut, yms.
Ryhmätentti ”Haastavat johtamistilanteet”
Arviointi: 0-5 (not translated)
Finnish
English
17.01.2020 - 09.05.2020
02.12.2019 - 31.12.2019
5 cr
19YTJ
Päivi Mayor, Tuula Niemi
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
3 cr
1 cr
0-5
Avoin kirja ryhmätentti viimeisellä luentokerralla. (not translated)
Johtamisen käsitteitä
Hyvä esimiestyö
Motivaatio ja itsensä johtaminen
Osaamisen johtaminen
Suorituksen johtaminen
Tiimien johtaminen
Muutosjohtaminen
Kommunikointi ja konfliktien hallinta
Esimies valmentajana
Haastavat johtamistilanteet ryhmätentti (not translated)
The student's project plan is incomplete. Various sections have not been done theoretically right. Schedule is static and becomes a mess with changes.
The student's project plan is complete and theoretically correct. Schedule is dynamic and behaves correctly with changes.
The student's project plan is complete and theoretically correct. Schedule is dynamic and behaves correctly with changes.Students show also the methods used to supervise and forecast the project outcome. The project plan also accounts for the steering group and other groups.
Marko Mäkilouko
Finnish
English
17.01.2020 - 09.05.2020
02.12.2019 - 31.12.2019
5 cr
19YTJ
Marko Mäkilouko
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Student will achieve the minimum acceptable level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report (portfolio) includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess basic knowledge & skills, parallelly presenting and emphasizing information relevant to objectives / students have also proven that they possess a wide range of information regarding course's topics / contents (Bloom's taxonomy level 1) and that they also understand the meaning of all the possessed information (Bloom's taxonomy level 2)
Student will achieve this level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess good knowledge & skills, parallelly combining already existing, original material with by themselves provided, value-adding information or knowledge / students have also proven that are (in addition to Bloom's levels 1 and 2) capable of applying all the acquired knowledge in to them relevant, working life situations (Bloom's taxonomy level 3) and that they are capable of analysing, breaking information into sub-parts and drawing conclusions based on this data (Bloom's taxonomy level 4)
Student will achieve this level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess exceptional knowledge & skills, parallelly combining already existing, original material with by themselves provided, value-adding information or knowledge in such a manner that this process will provide entirely new information (deductions, implications, applications, discoveries, summaries) /students have proven that they master all the earlier described Bloom's taxonomy levels (1-4) and are additionally capable of innovating and differentiating in their work all the acquired knowledge (Bloom's taxonomy level 5) - The highest level possible to acquire is Bloom's taxonomy level 6 which is to state that learner has obtained the highest level maturity possible - meaning that the learner can also critically observe his or hers learning process's outcomes and is autonomically capable of enhancing his or hers cognitive mental schemas, further to enhance learning efficiency
Matti Kivimäki
Teacher will define material to be used in the beginning of the course. During the entire course e-material will be provided and updated in cloud (=Tabula/Moodle/TAMK). Each student is strongly encouraged on individual, preferably most focused, relevant data mining from any chosen source (dissertations / articles / magazines / literature / media / interviews / web) - the use of such sources will be further addressed and explained in the beginning of course.
Processive learning, interactive discussions, rehearsals (written & oral). Can include also other type of activities
The course will be assessed based on a written peer group work (=portfolio). All the rehearsals during the course will affect on the course note if connected to portfolio and presented as part of it. Group size, reporting, modus operandi, all will be closer discussed on first classes. NOTICE! With a joint agreement between teacher and students any part of the course can become subject to modifications. The grading will take place by teacher reflecting the (through Urkund's plagiation prevention platform) delivered final portfolio against Bloom's taxonomy - depending which level the peer-group members have achieved with their portfolio, decides for the note. NOTICE! Peer-groups are entitled to fire such a member who, regardless of exhortations is unable to follow the guidelines, agreed upon by the peer-group internally. Such a (dismissed) member's note for the course will be zero (0).
The general evaluation criterias of TAMK are considered as well: https://www.tuni.fi/opiskelijanopas/kasikirja/tamk?search=arviointi&page=2198
Finnish
English
29.08.2020 - 31.07.2021
02.07.2020 - 31.07.2020
5 cr
20YTJ
12 - 36
Matti Kivimäki
Entire course is strictly focused on peer group working, with help of which the presented substance will be reflected towards peer-group chosen portfolio goal. Used pedagogy is processive learning. As active mind setting as possible, parallelly working as a group, is worthwhile - there is a strong correlation between better grading and intensive group work. All the group member will receive equal note of the course. Each group defines their working rules, which team members are obliged to follow the entire duration of the course. Additionally, each group is entitled to expell any fellow teammate that is not honouring jointly established rules.
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
2 cr
2 cr
0-5
Should the group noting be rejected (;note = "0"), the peer group can re-edit their written report twice. After third hand-over of the report the entire course will be considered as failed, after which the entire course is to be taken anewly. Missing, single attendances can be substituted by participating any other later remittance on the same course. Out of a special reason a single student can equiponderate mangel on performance with an assignment individually agreed with responsible teacher. Baseline is however (taking notice of the networking-, interaction- and organisation skills) that this course will be carried out in form of a peer group work ONLY - this is to be understood as an emphasis towards individual responsibility acting as a productive member of an peer group.
No practical training is foreseen, but it is preferred that participants actively promote during the entire course their connections and understanding to comply with course outline. All the co-operative measures towards industrial, economic and business life such as direct contacts, interviews, data collecting or own work life practices are considered as additional value for course accomplishing.
Industrial & business cases are usually used as example.
An exam will be organised only upon joint agreement between responsible teacher and course attendants. Baseline is that no exam will be held on this course (instead peer-groups will provide jointly one portfolio - portfolio process will be explicitly explained in the beginning of the course).
It is preferred, that participants actively promote during the entire course their international connections and networking. Additionally can be agreed on separate arrangement for students to acquire special knowledge or information recarding international activities.
Course entity is thus planned that student's time usage equals at each time Tamk's preset requirement. Face-to-face occurring class room educational activities is only a part of the students' work load. Another part of student work is all the processing that takes via peer groups, e.g. in form of discussion, analytical processing of information and additionally continuos development of course report (=portfolio) throughout the course. Third part of students' work is individually performed data mining and principles of knowledge managing - each peer group are urged to agree on peer-group internal rules of conduct to be strictly followed during the entire course.
Lectures & peergroup weeks take turns during entire course - however, changes to this may occur due to overlapping of excursions, Tamk-activities or other curriculum reasons. In such cases teacher usually informs peergroups by email or other, jointly agreed manner.
Should a student fail to actively participate throughout the course, such a performance will not be acknowledged. Should a student not have been participating to the portfolio process during any of its lifecycle stages, such a performance will not be acknowledged either (regardless of being enlisted to the course). Each peer-group will agree upon their rules & code of conducting, describing clearly the principles regarding their own working & processing - each peer-group have a right to dismiss/fire such a team member who, regardless of exhortations from the peer-group, has failed to participate on peer-group's work at an acceptable manner. Also: once peer-group will handover their portfolio for final evaluation, they will state the authors of the portfolio on its deck-page - any peer-groupmember's name missing from the deck-page acts as a signal towards teacher that such a student has become dismissed; note for stuch a students = null (0).
Student will achieve the minimum acceptable level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report (portfolio) includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess basic knowledge & skills, parallelly presenting and emphasizing information relevant to objectives / students have also proven that they possess a wide range of information regarding course's topics / contents (Bloom's taxonomy level 1) and that they also understand the meaning of all the possessed information (Bloom's taxonomy level 2)
Student will achieve this level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess good knowledge & skills, parallelly combining already existing, original material with by themselves provided, value-adding information or knowledge / students have also proven that are (in addition to Bloom's levels 1 and 2) capable of applying all the acquired knowledge in to them relevant, working life situations (Bloom's taxonomy level 3) and that they are capable of analysing, breaking information into sub-parts and drawing conclusions based on this data (Bloom's taxonomy level 4)
Student will achieve this level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess exceptional knowledge & skills, parallelly combining already existing, original material with by themselves provided, value-adding information or knowledge in such a manner that this process will provide entirely new information (deductions, implications, applications, discoveries, summaries) /students have proven that they master all the earlier described Bloom's taxonomy levels (1-4) and are additionally capable of innovating and differentiating in their work all the acquired knowledge (Bloom's taxonomy level 5) - The highest level possible to acquire is Bloom's taxonomy level 6 which is to state that learner has obtained the highest level maturity possible - meaning that the learner can also critically observe his or hers learning process's outcomes and is autonomically capable of enhancing his or hers cognitive mental schemas, further to enhance learning efficiency
Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her.
Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her. Student has generated a model to improve his or hers international know how.
Students know the structure of a culture and the values, beliefs and cognitive processes of some cultures that are relevant to him or her. Student has generated a model to improve his or hers international know how. Student can lead workers with different cultural background and organize while observing cultural differences. Student can create motivation, commitment and trust in an international project.
Marko Mäkilouko
Power point ja kirjallisuus Moodlessa (not translated)
Arviointi perustuu kirjaraporttiin 40% ja tenttiin 60%. Kirjaraportin voi korvata vierasluennon pitämisellä. Vierasluento on mahdollinen vain jos opiskelijalla on riittääv KV-kokemus, jonka kokemusksia voi jakaa muille. (not translated)
Finnish
English
01.08.2020 - 31.12.2020
02.07.2020 - 31.07.2020
5 cr
20YTJ
12 - 36
Marko Mäkilouko
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
1 cr
2 cr
0-5
Ei ole (not translated)
Useita (2-4) vierasluentoa (not translated)
Moodletentti sovitaan ryhmän kanssa yhteiseen vapaaseen hetkeen. (not translated)
Vieraspuhujat kertovat omasta KV-kokemuksesta (not translated)
Noin 100 tuntia (not translated)
Ei vastauksia tai vastauksissa ei tietosisältöä (not translated)
Opiskelija ei käytä teoriaa vastausten perusteluna (not translated)
Teoriaa on käytetty osittain hyväksi vastauksissa (not translated)
Opiskelija käyttää teoriaa vastausten perusteluna (not translated)
According to University's common thesis criteria.
According to University's common thesis criteria.
According to University's common thesis criteria.
Marko Mäkilouko
Finnish
01.08.2020 - 31.07.2021
02.07.2020 - 31.07.2020
30 cr
20YTJ
YITEJO Virtuaalihenkilö, Päivi Mayor, Matti Kivimäki, Ella Hakala, Marko Mäkilouko, Antti Perttula
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
30 cr
10 cr
0-5
The submissions are completed on time. Selected topics and tools are in the line with the course topic. However. the submission fails to address the assignment. The submission is highly limited and biased or does not consider the given instructions
The submission addresses the problem in the case with several appropriate tools. The solution identifies the causes of the problem. Each solution is considered and the advantages and disadvantages each solution are clearly explained. A recommendation is made as the most appropriate solution with an explanation.
Additional insights, analysis, synthesis or hypothesis are given. E.g. The long-term consequences of the solution are considered. Recommendations for action to avoid a repeat of the problem are provided.
Aija Paananen
Finnish
18.08.2020 - 23.11.2020
15.05.2020 - 01.09.2020
5 cr
20YAMK
20 - 40
Aija Paananen
Lähiopetus 3.- 5.9. (not translated)
Social Services, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Social Services, Master's Degree Programme in Automation in Smart Industry, Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
3 cr
2 cr
0-5
The student has a first understanding of how to lead experts in technology organizations. The participant is able to list the key areas of leadership, but is unable to apply them to his / her own work or previous experience, or to solve challenging managerial situations.
The student has a clear understanding of leading the experts in technology organizations. The participant is able to list the key areas of leadership and is able to apply them to some extent to their own work or previous experiences and to solving challenging managerial situations.
The student has an excellent understanding of leading the experts in technology organizations. The participant is able to apply and further develop the key areas of leadership in both his own work and solving challenging managerial situations with others. The participant is able to reflect on his / her own activities and skills in a versatile way, and develop his / her own activities from the management perspective.
Päivi Mayor
Finnish
English
01.08.2020 - 31.07.2021
02.07.2020 - 31.07.2020
5 cr
20YTJ
12 - 36
Liiketoiminta ja palvelut Virtuaalihenkilö, Liiketalous Virtuaalihenkilö, International Business, IB Virtuaalihenkilö
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
1 cr
1 cr
0-5
The student's project plan is incomplete. Various sections have not been done theoretically right. Schedule is static and becomes a mess with changes.
The student's project plan is complete and theoretically correct. Schedule is dynamic and behaves correctly with changes.
The student's project plan is complete and theoretically correct. Schedule is dynamic and behaves correctly with changes.Students show also the methods used to supervise and forecast the project outcome. The project plan also accounts for the steering group and other groups.
Finnish
English
01.01.2021 - 31.07.2021
02.12.2020 - 31.12.2020
5 cr
20YTJ
Technology Management, Master
Master's Degree Programme in Technology Management
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Master of Engineering, EQF 7
The Master’s degree (polytechnic) is intended for people who have completed the degree of Bachelor in Engineering and who have at least three years of working experience in a related field, after having completed the degree. For an applicant who has first completed a vocational or higher vocational diploma and then the applicable Bachelor’s degree, the minimum of three years of work experience may be accepted as the required work experience, provided that at lest one year has been accumulated after the completion of the Bachelor’s degree.
It is possible for students to have their prior competence recognised.
See TAMK’s credit transfer guidelines
Completion of curriculum studies and achievement of related competence objectives.
Further information:
TAMK Degree Regulations
Ammattikorkeakoululaki ja asetus ammattikorkeakouluista
The degree is a master-level professional higher education degree.
The degree complies with the criteria set by the Finnish national degree system as well as with the European framework for degrees and other competence.
Ammattikorkeakoululaki ja asetus ammattikorkeakouluista
The aim of the degree programme is to create professionals who are able to lead expertise in technology-based businesses and other organisations using technology extensively. The degree programme focuses especially on the skills needed to lead technology experts and technology competence, product development and innovation management, financial management, project management, international working environments and the development of the students’ own leadership behaviour.
You will get the skills needed to the demanding leadership tasks in your field. Engineers with these skills are also needed in product development and innovation management, financial management, project management, international environments and developing one’s own management behaviour.
The master’s degree from a university of applied sciences produces the eligibility for postgraduate studies as a master’s degree from a university.
Assessment of study performances is based on TAMK’s assessment criteria
The detailed assessment criteria can be found in course implementation plans. The teaching and assessment methods are agreed on with students at the beginning of each course.
TAMK Degree Regulations
Completion of studies and achievement of competence objectives in the extent set by the curriculum.
The Ministry of Education and Culture’ definitions of policy and TAMK’s strategy have been considered in the curriculum.