Please select the curriculum by the start year of studies and orientation line.
Mika Nieminen
All lecture materials and laboratory instructions are available in Tabula. In addition, there are several good sources available for learning more about the water and wastewater engineering. One very thorough one is a book by George Tchobanoglous (1987). We recommend you to use e-books available in TAMK library, for example a book by Stephenson and Stuetz (2009) is a good source and can be accessed as an e-book.
Stephenson, Tom Stuetz, Richard. (2009). Principles of Water and Wastewater Treatment Processes. IWA Publishing. Online version available at TAMK library e-books.
Tchobanoglous, G. 1987. Water quality: Characteristics, modeling, modification. repr. with corr. Reading (Mass.): Addison-Wesley.
Teach-in, field excursion, assignments,laboratory work, group work, exam
The course consists of lectures and discussions, exercises, field excursion of which students write report, compulsory laboratory exercise (follow up of a pilot wastewater treatment plant during a study-period: periodical sampling, sample analyses) and exam. Together these form the course grade as follows:
short assignments max. 40 points; laboratory report max. 30 points; exam max. 30 points
Grade 0: 0-29 points; grade 1: 30-44 points; grade 2: 45-59 points; grade 3:60-74 points; grade 4: 75-89 points; grade 5: 90-100 points.
English
05.09.2019 - 12.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
5 cr
16IDEE
25 - 32
Seija Haapamäki, Hilda Szabo
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Exam at the end of the course.
Contact lectures, exercises 24h
Laboratory exercises, module checking and sample analyses 18 h
Wastewater treatemnt plant visit 4 h
Self study (weakly assignments, pretasks, laboratory report) 85 h
Total 135 h.
Physical, chemical and biological water and wastewater treatment units, natural wastewater treatment, alternative wastewater management options.
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is insufficient.
This means that
-some of the assignments were done acceptably
-the student is not familiar with the basic concepts discussed during the course
-can perform the laboratory measurements and experiments under supervision
-has no basic skills in reporting the results of the measurements and experiments
-seldom and inactive participation in the lectures
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is sufficient but narrow.
This means that
-some of the assignments were done acceptably
-the student is familiar with the basic concepts discussed during the course but often makes mistakes when applying them
-can perform the laboratory measurements and experiments under supervision
-has basic skills in reporting the results of the measurements and experiments
-seldom and inactive participation in the lectures
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is structural. This means that:
-most of the assignments were done and accepted
-exam shows that the student is familiar with the concepts discussed during the course and can apply them in most of the situations
-is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly
-can perform laboratory measurements and experiments independently
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student attends to apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is wide. This means that:
-the assignments were done excellently
-student is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly, shows creativity in solving tasks
- can perform simple laboratory measurements and experiments independently
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student can apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed, eventually brings up new subject of interest
Hilda Szabo
English
01.01.2020 - 01.12.2020
09.09.2019 - 07.01.2020
15 cr
16IDEE
30 - 35
Taru Owston, Sampo Saari, Marja Oksanen, Aki Korpela, Hilda Szabo, Tiiti Kämäri, Pirjo Puustjärvi, Silja Kostia, PEDA Virtuaalihenkilö, Tuukka Tonteri, Pasi Arvela
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
15 cr
2 cr
0-5
Overall the achieved competence is sufficient but narrow. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that is familiar with the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course: atoms and elements, periodicity, chemical bonds, chemical quantities. Student can write and balance chemical equations and can solve model exercises correctly. In addition student can perform simple laboratory measurements and soil sample analysis under supervision and has basic skills in reporting the results of the analyses.
Student manages the assigned tasks under supervision. Student knows diverse courses of action, but cannot justify his/her choices. Completion of the tasks is based on routine and pre-learned performance.
Student can give and receive feedback, and considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint. Student can work in a group and recognises his/her interaction skills. Student takes responsibility for his/her own work.
Overall the achieved competence is structural. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that he/she is fluent in explaining and applying the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course. Student shows that he/she can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly, can perform simple laboratory measurements and soil sample analysis independently. In addition, reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student attends to apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results.
Student can select the most appropriate course of action from diverse options and justify his/her choices when solving the problems. Student is able to make plans and apply his/her knowledge when solving the problems.
Student can give and receive feedback actively and constructively, and considers and assesses things both from his/her and the close community's viewpoint. Student can cooperate responsibly and is ready to develop his/her interaction skills. Student recognises and follows the important courses of action in the field. Student takes responsibility and commits to the group activities in addition to his/her own work.
Overall the achieved competence is wide. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course. Student can solve model exercises and new exercises correctly and shows creativity in solving the tasks. Student can perform simple laboratory measurements and soil sample analysis independently and understands the background of the used analytical method. Reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student can apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results.
Student can search for diverse courses of action and solution alternatives, justify his/her choices and try new courses of action. Student assesses diverse solution alternatives.
Student uses feedback systematically as a professional growth tool in his/her own work and the community. Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task. Student can cooperate responsibly, flexibly and constructively, and develops his/her own and the group's interaction. Student works responsibly and in a committed manner considering the community and field requirements and needs.
Mika Nieminen
Materials and guidances posted in Tabula and discussed during the lectures.
Textbook: Karen Timberlake & William Timberlake: Basic Chemistry, Pearson international edition
Contact teaching, exercises, self-study, assignments, laboratory exercises
Grading scale is 0-5. The course grade will form according to the points collected as follows:
-6 short assignments (max 5 points/assignment), containing the home exercises which are given weekly max.30 points
-Three laboratory reports (max 15 points/total)
-Exam max.50 points (30 + 20 points) and safety exam max. 5 points
Grading: grade 0: 0-29 points; grade 1: 30-44 points; grade 2: 45-59 points; grade 3:60-74 points; grade 4: 75-89 points; grade 5: 90-100 points
English
27.08.2019 - 05.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
5 cr
19IENVE
25 - 35
Seija Haapamäki, Hilda Szabo
At least 60 % attendance to courses+ exercise sessions required
-Laboratory works and reporting are compulsory
-Before starting the laboratories each student has to pass a safety exam (Week 44 in period II)
-Exam is compulsory (in two parts or retake)
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Occupational Safety Card Training 8 * 60 minutes, contact teaching 2 * 4 hours (an hour defined as 60 minutes, standard coming from Centre of Occupational Safety). To pass the subsection you need to be present on the contact sessions and to pass a test which will be arranged in the end of the session. After fulfilling the requirements of mandatory presence and passing a specified exam , you will receive an Occupational Safety Card (registered trademark), which you are able to utilise in your CV and when applying work in Finland.
Contact lessons, discussions, 40h, laboratory exercises 9 h, self-study 81 h, exam and feedback 5h. Total 135 h.
Atomic structure, Periodic table, chemical bonds, chemical quantities, chemical reactions, concentrations, laboratory safety, three laboratory exercises
The student might have passed the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. Student might have participated in the exam.
Overall the achieved competence is insufficient. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is not familiar with the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-cannot write and balance chemical equations and cannot solve model exercises correctly
-can perform simple laboratory measurements and soil sample analysis under supervision
-has basic skills in reporting the results of the analysis
The student passed the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. Student participated in the exam.
Overall the achieved competence is sufficient but narrow. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is familiar with the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course: atoms and elements, periodicity, chemical bonds, chemical quantities.
-can write and balance chemical equations and can solve model exercises correctly
-can perform simple laboratory measurements and soil sample analysis under supervision
-has basic skills in reporting the results of the analysis
The student passed the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. Student participated in the exam.
Overall the achieved competence is structural. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course: atoms and elements, periodicity, chemical bonds, chemical quantities.
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly
- can perform simple laboratory measurements and soil sample analysis independently
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student attends to apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed
The student passed the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. Student participated in the exam.
Overall the achieved competence is wide. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course: atoms and elements, periodicity, chemical bonds, chemical quantities
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly, shows creativity in solving tasks
- can perform simple laboratory measurements and soil sample analysis independently
-understands the background of the analytical method
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student can apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed, eventually brings up new subject of interest
Student can recognize, name and define field-related phenomena and basic concepts.
Student manages the assigned tasks assisted. Knows diverse courses of action but cannot justify his/her choices. Completion of tasks is based on routine or pre-learned performance.
Student can give and receive feedback. Student considers and assesses things from his/her viewpoint. Student can work in a group. Student recognises important courses of action in the field. Student takes reponsibility for his/her own work.
Mika Nieminen
See Tabula: 5E00EK31-3001 Computer and Software Tools
Contact teaching, exercises, self-studying, assignments
Grading scale is 0-5. The grade is given according to the points given on the mandatory practical work.
English
28.08.2019 - 27.11.2019
10.06.2019 - 08.09.2019
3 cr
19IENVE
25 - 35
Tomi Salo
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
The course can be completed by making practical test with passed assessment. The practical work must be made within the course schedule.
No written exams. Deadlines for the submission of practical work and assessments are given during the course.
More detailed instructions will be given in the practical work instructions.
Approximately 28 hours of computer class training sessions and approximately 53 hours of self study. Total approx. 81 hours.
TAMK network and computer services
Microsoft (MS) Excel
MS Word
MS PowerPoint
No practical work is returned within the given time limits. Or the returned practical work does not meet the given minimum requirements.
Knowledge and understanding of the core network services of TAMK. The basic skills in using MS Office programs; Word, Excel and PowerPoint. Basic skills in creating reports with MS Office programs.
Knowledge and understanding of the core network services of TAMK. Fluent skills in using Office programs of Word, Excel and PowerPoint. Fluent skills in creating reports with Office programs. The ability to use some advanced methods of Office programs in appropriate parts of the reports or in Office programs.
Knowledge and understanding of the core network services of TAMK. The fluent skills in using MS Office programs; Word, Excel and PowerPoint. Fluent skills in creating reports with MS Office programs. Ability and knowledge to use many advanced methods of Office programs. The recognition and fluent use of appropriate report specific basic and advanced features of Office programs and use of those in reports or in Office programs.
Mika Nieminen
Keijzer et al. 2006. In situ soil and groundwater remediation: theory and practice. Tauw, the Netherlands.
Hester, R.E., Harrison, R.M. 2001. Assessment and Reclamation of Contaminated Land. Issues in Environmental Science and Technology. RSC. ISBN 0-85404-275-X. EBook/Knovel.
Strange, J. and Langdon, H. 2008. Contaminated Land - Investigation, Assessment and Remediation (2nd Edition) ICE design and practice guides. Thomas Telford. ISBN 978-0-7277-3482. eBook/Knovel.
Muñiz-Hernández, Saé, Bernardino Velázquez-Fernández, Jesús. 2013. Bioremediation: Processes, Challenges and Future Prospects. Hauppauge, New York : Nova Science Publishers. ISBN 9781629485133. EBook/EBSCOhost.
Murphy, BL, & Morrison, RD 2007, Introduction to Environmental Forensics (2), Academic Press, Burlington, US. Available from: ProQuest ebrary. [14 August 2016]. Chapter 2: Site History: The First Tool of the Environmental Forensics Team
http://site.ebrary.com.elib.tamk.fi/lib/tamperepoly/reader.action?ppg=50&docID=10186017&tm=1471177699469
Other written material available via Tabula
Coaching will be used as the main pedagogical method on this course. The course consists of varying weekly themes, which include: weekly reading materials and topic-related Tabula assignments, contact lessons where weekly themes are discussed, and a research project related to themes announced during the course.
Assessment of the course is based on weekly assignments (10 pcs, 60 %) and final report (40 %). In order to pass the course, all assignments have to be returned. There are deadlines for all assignments, if assignments are after the given deadlines, it will have an effect on the final grade.
Self-evaluation and group evaluation are mandatory parts of the course and shall be returned to teachers as instructed by the end of the course. In addition, all fieldwork exercises are a mandatory part of the course.
English
02.09.2019 - 14.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 02.09.2019
4 cr
16IDEE
25 - 35
Mika Nieminen, Inka Honkala, Mika Nieminen, Hilda Szabo
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
If you have work experience from contaminated soils and groundwater, you have a possibility to negotiate for alternative ways to complete the course. Also, if you have taken a course with a similar kind of content, please contact the teachers.
Contact lessons and laboratory exercises 50 hours
Self-study (reports, exercises, exam) 58 hours
Total 108 hours
Please note that the allocation for independent study is more than half of the time allocated to the course, so this requires significant self-study input.
All timetables and lecture topics can be read from the Lukkarikone. May there be any changes in the timetable or content, the course participants will be notified about the changes during the course.
Competences required have not been achieved in a sufficient level and/or indicators of the competences are missing: Participation on the course activities, assignments and reports are deficient, belated or missing. Achieved competence in design, study and report contaminated soil project have not been shown with sufficient input and knowledge and understanding of the core concepts and phenomena are not proven.
Achieved competence in design, study and report contaminated soil project is sufficient, but narrow. Knowledge and understanding of the core concepts and phenomena, like fate and transport of chemicals in soil, analysis methods, remediation methods are mainly adopted. Basic skills in soil sampling, site investigation, analysis and reporting and ability to do the analyses in practise when instructed and supervised. Basic theoretical knowledge and understanding in geotechnical engineering and soil pollution.
Achieved competence in design, study and report contaminated soil project is structured and applied. Fluent knowledge and understanding of the core concepts and phenomena, like fate and transport of chemicals in soil, analysis methods, remediation methods. Sufficient skills and ability in independent soil sampling, site investigation, analysis and reporting and ability to do the analyses in practise. Fluent theoretical knowledge and understanding in geotechnical engineering and soil pollution.
Achieved competence is wide, creative and developing. Fluent knowledge and understanding of the core concepts and phenomena like fate and transport of chemicals in soil, analysis methods, remediation methods. In addition, ability to apply the knowledge in new situations. Sufficient skills and understanding in independent soil sampling, site investigation, analysis and reporting and ability to make suggestions for developing and/or improving these methods. Fluent theoretical knowledge and understanding in geotechnical engineering and soil pollution and positive attitude to develop oneself in these fields.
Mika Nieminen
Material and guidances posted in Tabula.
Contact teaching,self study,discussions, assignments, summary report/essay,laboratory exercise, exam and seminar presentations
The course consists of lectures and discussions,assignments,daily tasks, group work, laboratory exercise (1 cu) and exam. Together these form the course grade as follows:
Individual assignments (3 / accepted) 15%; “Daily” tasks 15%; Group work (compulsory) 15%; Exam (compulsory)35%; Laboratory exercise 20%
The course grade is calculated as a weighted average from the grades of each task. The exam will be an open book exam.
This course is offered for students from TUT as well, as a 3 credits course without the laboratory exercise.
English
27.08.2019 - 11.10.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
4 cr
17IDEE
25 - 32
Seija Haapamäki, Hilda Szabo
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Open book exam at the end of the course.
Contact lectures, presentations 31 h
Laboratory exercises 18 h
Exam and feedback 4h
Self study, reports and assignments 51 h
Total 104 h
The course has the following main topics:
Basic concepts and research methods in toxicology, chemical and biological interactions, chemicals hazardous to the health and the environment, environmental-based health problems, threshold values and their role, risk analysis
Student did not participate the exam and/or the laboratory exercise, or student participate the exam and laboratory exercise, but the achieved competence is insufficient. This means that the student is not familiar with the basic concepts related to the subjects discussed during the course.
Student participated in the exam and laboratory exercises.
Overall the achieved competence is sufficient but narrow.
Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is familiar with the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course:
-can solve model exercise correctly
-has the basic skills in performing a laboratory exercise related to ecotoxicological testing
-has basic skills in reporting the results of the testing
Student participated in the exam and laboratory exercise.
Overall the achieved competence is structural.
Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed
-has sufficient skills to be able to perform independently a laboratory exercise related to ecotoxicological testing
-the reporting of the results shows that the student can apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results of testing, though
Student participated in the exam and laboratory exercises.
Overall the achieved competence is wide.
Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly, shows creativity in solving tasks
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed
-has sufficient skills to be able to perform independently a laboratory exercise related to ecotoxicological testing
-the reporting of the results shows that the student can apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results and can think about alternative solutions
Eeva-Liisa Viskari
Course material is informed in Tabula. Partly it will be literature or internet based material, partly teacher’s own material and partly material made by student’s work groups during the course.
Lectures
Basic training of the IR-photographing
Exercises and pair/group works
End of the course –exam
Evaluation of the exam, 0 to 5
Returned exercises
Activeness in lessons and group works
End of the course –exam
English
13.01.2020 - 27.04.2020
25.11.2019 - 18.01.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
16IDEE
25 - 40
Sakari Lepola
IMPORTANT IMPORTATION
The Finnish Covernment has given several new orders because of the current Corona virus (Covid19) pandemia. The situation forces the university to make some changes to contact lessons as well as the type and the form of exercise(s) and the exam of this course. The basic principle of the course will be still the same, but we have to use innovative methods to fullfill the course and to make the end of the course exam.
No changes has been made to any other text in this plan, this text explains all the necessary changes which will happen between the middle of March - the end of the course.
Sakari Lepola
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Participating the lessons is mandatory in the beginning of the course, when practising IR- photographing and when making and presenting the pair and/or group seminars. Participating the lessons is very useful, when practicing the Excel -calculating programme.
The exam of the course will be carried out in the end of the course. The exact day will be clear during the end section of the course.
This course is very good possibility to build up international connections with other participants from different countries and from multicultural backgrounds.
Contact lessons in this course some 30-40 hours. Additional seminar work with own group 10-15 hours and one possible excursion, which takes app. one working day.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is normal, some absences are possible. The minimum requirement is to fully participate to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is good, some absences are possible. Student participates actively to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam with good marks.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is good, some absences are possible. Student participates actively to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam with excellent marks.
Mika Nieminen
Workshops, written and spoken assignments.
The grade is based on the following assignments:
CV, cover letter and job interview (+/-)
Reflection on the job interview (0-5)
Negotiation task (+/-)
Document concerning the negotiation (0-5)
Business correspondence (several tasks, we agree which are graded)
Presentation (can raise your grade)
- peer evaluation
- self evaluation
English
02.09.2019 - 29.11.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
3 cr
18IDEE
Taru Owston, Emmanuel Abruquah
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
A student who has studied the learning goals and assessment criteria of the course can contact Taru Owston via email and explain where s/he has already achieved them.
The grade is based on continuous assesment on tasks completed on time as well attendance, participation in class activities e.g. negotiation role play, meetings, etc.
International group.
APPLYING FOR A JOB MODULE
- workshops and a job interview
- individual tasks: searching for a job advertisement, cover letter and CV/video CV, reflection
BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
MEETINGS AND NEGOTIATIONS
Failure to complete tasks on time or according to the norms given.
Tasks are completed.Student's English is mainly formal and accurate; the written and spoken tasks meet the norms given, references to source materials are incorporated consistently and in a variety of ways, source materials are adequately paraphrased. Spoken interaction is understandable.
Tasks are completed following the instructions.Student's English is mainly formal and accurate; the written and spoken tasks meet norms given, references to source materials are incorporated consistently and in a variety of ways, source materials are adequately paraphrased. Spoken interaction is relatively good.
Tasks are completed following the instructions and on time. Student's English is formal and accurate; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently and in a variety of ways, source materials are adequately paraphrased. Spoken interaction is excellent.
Mika Nieminen
Handouts ( and exercises) and additional material posted in Tabula.
Contact teaching, exercises,group work, self study, assignments, laboratory exercises, reporting, exam
Grading scale is 0-5. The course grade will form according to the points collected as follows:
- short assignments containing the home exercises which are given weekly: max. 20 points
-group task, max.10 points
-6 compulsory laboratory exercises and related reporting: max.30 points
-Exam ( given in two parts): max. 20 +20 = 40 points
Grading: grade 0: 0-29 points; grade 1: 30-44 points; grade 2: 45-59 points; grade 3:60-74 points; grade 4: 75-89 points; grade 5: 90-100 points.
English
01.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
6 cr
18IDEE
Marita Hiipakka, Hilda Szabo, Juha Hurmalainen
Learning goals
-to know the different groups of hydrocarbons, compounds with functional groups, large molecular compounds of biological importance – their properties, naming and roles
-to understand the mechanisms of environmental pollution and to know the main pollutants of air, water and soil
-to understand the fundamentals of qualitative, quantitative and instrumental analysis
-to be familiar with volumetric and some instrumental analytical methods and to apply them in practice
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Two partial exams: one in the middle and the second at the end of the course. Retakes will be agreed later.
Contact lessons and discussions 30 h
Laboratory exercises 34 h
Exams and feedback 5h
Self-study 87 h
Total 156 h
Hydrocarbons, functional compounds (alcohols, aldehydes and ketones, carboxylic acids, esthers, amines, amides, halogenated compounds), biochemistry (carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, nucleic acids). Overview of the most important environmental pollutants. Overview of chemical processes in the environment. Volumetry, chromatography, atomic absorbtion spectroscopy, indicator microorganisms and related laboratory exercises.
The student participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. Student participated in the exam.
Overall the achieved competence is insufficient. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is not familiar with the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course: main classes of hydrocarbons and functional compounds, main classes of (organic) pollutants and environmental processes
-cannot solve model exercises correctly
-can perform volumetric, instrumental and simple microbiological analyses of soil samples or various water samples under supervision
-has basic skills in reporting the results of the analysis
The student participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. Student participated in the exam.
Overall the achieved competence is sufficient but narrow. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is familiar with the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course: main classes of hydrocarbons and functional compounds, main classes of (organic) pollutants and environmental processes
- can solve model exercises correctly
-can perform volumetric, instrumental and simple microbiological analyses of soil samples or various water samples under supervision
-has basic skills in reporting the results of the analysis
The student participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. Student participated in the exam.
Overall the achieved competence is structural. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course: main classes of hydrocarbons and functional compounds, main classes of (organic) pollutants and environmental processes
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly, based on given models is able to write chemical reactions of the organic compounds correctly (oxidation, reduction, addition, esterification, peptide formation….)
-can perform volumetric, instrumental and simple microbiological analyses of soil samples or various water samples independently
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student attends to apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed
The student participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. Student participated in the exam.
Overall the achieved competence is wide. Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions, laboratory exercises and exam) that:
-is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course: main classes of hydrocarbons and functional compounds, main classes of (organic) pollutants and environmental processes
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly, shows creativity in solving tasks, is able to write chemical reactions of the organic compounds correctly (oxidation, reduction, addition, esterification, peptide formation….) independently
-can perform volumetric, instrumental and simple microbiological analyses of soil samples or various water samples independently
-understands the background of the analytical method
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student can apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed, eventually brings up new subjects of interest
Eeva-Liisa Viskari
English
07.01.2020 - 27.03.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.01.2020
3 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 35
Mia O´Neill
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Tuukka Tonteri
The study material available in Tabula.
Lectures by responsible and visiting lecturers
Discussions
Group work and presentation
Opponing
Exercises
Learning journal
Self study
The grading is affected by
Attendance and active participation in class 25%
Visiting lecturers' lecture attendance 25 %
Group work, presentation and opponing 25 %
Learning journal 25 %
English
07.01.2020 - 07.03.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.01.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 35
Silja Kostia, Tuukka Tonteri
The course is intended for 3rd year students who already passed the Public Administration and Participation course, or who have knowledge accordingly, and for exchange students, with an interest in gaining a general comprehensive understanding of environmental legislation and administration.
To pass the course a student is required to
1. attend min. 70% of contact teaching lectures
2. work as a group member making an environmental permit application, EIA –rehearsal of a case and presenting it for the rest of the group, opponing other groups
3. write a learning journal
4. return assignments (group work, learning journal and any other) BY DEADLINE into Tabula
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
-
Visiting lecturers create contact to work life.
No exam.
4 credits results in 108 hours of work required from a student.
Contact teaching covers 39 hours.
Self study, assignments, reporting and group work 69 hours.
-
The student has not participated contact lectures as required, done the group work or done the learning journal.
The student has not returned the group work parts (env. permit application, report, presentation, opponing) or the learning journal by deadline.
The student knows the environmental regulation system. The student is able to produce a learning diary. The student knows some group work skills. The student has potential in learning to utilize the possibility for co-operation and collective learning by participating the lectures, workshops and group work. The student is able to utilise some of the chance to learn from experienced professionals and therefore to participate the visiting lecturer’s lectures on the course. The student understands the importance of getting prepared to the session topics by returning the given pretasks. The students is able to work according to instructions given but might have challenges on meeting the deadlines.
The student shows understanding of the environmental regulation systems and the student is able to apply some of the knowledge gained during the course when doing the assignments. The student is able to express thoughts and reflections in his/her learning diary. The student knows group work skills. The student is able to utilize the possibility for co-operation and collective learning by participating the lectures, workshops and group works. The student is able to utilise the chance to learn from experienced professionals and therefore to participate the visiting lecturer’s lectures on the course. The students is able to work according to instructions given and by meeting the deadlines.
The student shows understanding of the environmental regulation systems and the student is able to apply the knowledge gained during the course when doing the assignments. The student is able to analytically express thoughts and reflections in his/her learning diary. The student knows excellent group work skills. The student is able to utilize the possibility for co-operation and collective learning by participating the lectures, workshops and group works in an active manner. The student is able to actively utilise the chance to learn from experienced professionals and therefore to participate the visiting lecturer’s lectures on the course and to apply the knowledge gained. The student understands the importance of getting prepared to the session topics by returning the given pretasks. The students is able to work according to instructions given and by meeting the deadlines.
Tuukka Tonteri
All materials will be distributed via Tabula. Lecture materials include references to relevant literature.
Contact teaching, assignments, self-study, group works and a field visit. Language of instruction is English.
The evaluation of the course is based on continuous evaluation:
Learning outcomes that are based on the knowledge and skills achieved with the course assignments, reports and exam.
The final grade consists of the following elements:
- Exam, 30 %
- Group work (CSR), 40 %
- Individual assignment, 30 %
Late submissions will affect the grade.
English
07.01.2020 - 31.05.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.01.2020
6 cr
20KVIENVE
18KVTBPT
18IDEE
25 - 40
Juha Mettälä, Tuukka Tonteri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No alternative ways to pass the course.
There will be an open book Tabula exam in the end of the course. The exam date will be published shortly after the course starts.
Contact teaching, group works done during the lecture time, and a site visit 54-66 hours, self-study (reports, exercises, exam) 96-108 hours. Approximately 162 hours in total. Given hours are approximates and are based on general guidelines (1 ECTS cr equals approx. 27 h of work).
See lecture schedules, topics and classrooms from Lukkarikone at lukkarit.tamk.fi
Student do not participate group work and fails to submit the assignment in time. Student does not participate on the exam or do not otherwise pass the exam.
Student participated in the group work, personal assignment and in the exam. The achieved competence is sufficient for passing the course but remains narrow.
Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions) and at the exam that is familiar with the basic concepts and phenomena related to environmental management systems, auditing and other themes discussed during the course. Student has basic theoretical knowledge in environmental management systems.
The group work was done, reported and presented within the deadline but background information remained minimal, reporting structured according to the instructions but literature references are missing, presentation incomplete, discussion and conclusions are inadequate showing that only narrow competence is achieved.
Student participated in the group work and in the exam. The achieved competence is structured and student can apply the theoretical knowledge in known situations.
Student knows and understands the basic concepts and phenomena related to environmental management systems, auditing and other themes discussed during the course. Student has good knowledge in the structure of environmental management systems and the student understands the requirements of environmental management systems (for example ISO 14001, EMAS). Student is motivated towards the subjects discussed.
The group work was done, reported and presented properly and within the deadline, background information collected, reporting has been structured according to the instructions, with references to the reliable sources, presentation of the results mostly correct eventually with small mistakes, discussion and conclusions are adequate showing deep understanding of the concepts and ability to apply them.
Student participated in the group work and in the exam. The achieved competence is wide and student can apply the theoretical knowledge in changing situations.
Student has fluent knowledge and understanding the basic concepts and phenomena related to environmental management systems, auditing and other themes discussed during the course. Student has fluent knowledge in the structure of environmental management systems and the student understands the requirements of environmental management systems (for example ISO 14001, EMAS). Student is motivated towards the subjects discussed, shows creativity and has a positive attitude towards developing itself.
The group work was done, reported and presented very well and within the deadline, background information collected, reporting has been structured according to the instructions, with references to the reliable sources, presentation correct, discussion and conclusions are adequate and based on comparison to literature, conclusions are clear and clearly expressed. The work shows deep understanding of the concepts and that the student has sufficient skills to apply correctly the theoretical knowledge.
Mika Nieminen
Lecture material in tabula.tamk.fi
Contact teaching
Measurement work
Co-operative and independent studying
Computer simulation modelling work
Guidance with video material
Reporting and presentations
Evaluation is based on measurement and modelling work, reporting and seminar presentations.
Weighting:
Noise measurements and modelling 40%
Air quality monitoring 40%
Seminars 20%
English
02.09.2019 - 15.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 08.09.2019
4 cr
16IDEE
Jari Puranen, Jarmo Lilja
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No exams
Contact classes and seminars (in groups): 36h
Independent modelling work 12h
Independent self study, measurements and reporting 60h
Total 108 h
Introduction 3 h
Noise measurements and modelling 15 h
Air quality monitoring 15 h
Seminars 3 h
Missing reports or seminar presentations.
Student is able to analyse simple noise and particle modelling cases both qualitatively and quantitatively. Student needs extra support to be able to complete given tasks. Exercises have been done, but results might be slightly erroneous or conclusions are incomplete.
Student is able to use correct terminology and presents justified qualitative and quantitative analysis. Exercises are done completely, and results and analysis are correct. Results are at least briefly commented.
Student shows the ability to do versatile qualitative and quantitative analysis. Student has a realistic knowledge of the limitations of the theoretical framework. Reports are comprehensive and well-structured. Student is able to clearly show his or her own conclusions related to the results, applications and legislation.
Mika Nieminen
Kristiina Kuparinen - Terhi Tapaninen - Karoliina Kuisma SUN SUOMI Finnish for beginners From the chapter 10, authentic energy and environmental engineering material, material made or linked on the course-Tabula by the teacher.
contact teaching, study conversation, cooperative learning, oral and written exercises and games
Continuous assessment based on classwork, active participation (to pass the course the minimum attendance 80 % is required), accepted exercises, passed smaller tests and text tasks. The mark will be given on the strenght of activity (three class activity tests 33 %), an oral test e.g. a professional video (33 %) and results of written texts and comprehension tests (33 %).
English
02.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 09.09.2019
4 cr
18IDEE
Marja Oksanen
Level A1-A2.
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No.
No.
The dates of smaller tests will be announced later on: there won't be a large final exam.
The whole group is international! Let's try to get some Finnish students along!
Two weekly double lessons - as mentioned above - almost the whole autumn term. The break after studying Finnish in the spring causes need to revise before learned. Because this is a 4 ECT course, the total amount of student work has been estimated at least 4 x 27 hours = 108 hours. So quite much independent work is needed to approve the skills of basic Finnish. No huge final exam, but smaller tests and a lot of oral communication. Try your best to make Finnish language your hobby!
In the beginning of the course revising the contents learnt last year. Then essential Finnish in energy and environmental engineer's work - also a couple of new important structures plus new vocabulary using the last chapters of SUN SUOMI.
A student has big difficulties to understand and produce the simplest basic phrases and expressions. Pronunciation causes misunderstanding.She/he has not attended regularly contact lessons having more than 20 % absences and she/he has not managed to complete all assignments.
A student has completed all the assignments acceptably and attended at least 80 % of the contact lessons. A student can carry on a simple conversation on very familiar topics using memorized words and phrases. She/he can say when she/he doesn't understand and ask people to repeat or speak more slowly. She/he can understand words, short phrases and expressions used daily and the main idea of a conversation about a familiar topic when people speak slowly and clearly and use gestures, props or pictures - and the same kind of understanding about written texts.
In addition to the criteria 1 - 2: A student has an active attitude towards learning both basic and professional language showing that by completing tasks according to the schedule. She/he can understand and use familiar everyday expressions and very basic phrases aimed at the satisfaction of needs of a concrete type. She/he can introduce themselves and others and can ask and answer questions about personal details such as where he/she lives, people they know and things they have. A student can interact in a simple way provided the other person talks slowly and clearly and is prepared to help.
In addition to the criteria 1 - 4: A student has a positive and active attitude towards learning language. She or he shows that he or she understands the importance of good Finnish skills in working life by completing tasks extraordinary way and showing her/his will to learn more. She/he can understand sentences and frequently used expressions related to areas of most immediate relevance (e.g. very basic personal and family information, shopping, local geography, employment). She/he can communicate in simple and routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of information on familiar and routine matters. A student can describe in simple terms aspects of their background, immediate environment and matters in areas of immediate need.
Knowledge of the most essential phenomena and related quantities and units in fluid mechanics and thermophysics. Capability to analyse qualitatively and quantitatively simple cases related phenomena similar to discussed examples
In addition capability to apply the principles to new situations. Fluent usage of the terminology and models in presentations of justified qualitative and quantitative analyses of phenomena
In addition versatile ability to analyse phenomena qualitatively and quantitaively realizing the limitations related to theories in use.
Mika Nieminen
English
22.10.2019 - 31.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
3 cr
19IENVE
25 - 35
Sampo Saari, Tuomo Nieminen
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Student understands the basic concepts of functions and matrices and is able to solve simple applications that are similar to the model problems solved during the course.
In addition, student is able to solve simple equations involving basic functions and knows how to apply matrices to technical problems. Student is also able to explain the methods of her/his solutions.
In addition, student has an overall understanding of using course topics to solve various applications and the ability to present and justify the chosen methods of solution.
Mika Nieminen
English
04.11.2019 - 20.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
3 cr
19IENVE
Jukka Suominen
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Mika Nieminen
Lecture slides and other materials will be available through the course's Tabula page.
Other materials:
Ebert, J I 2007, Chapter 3: Photogrammetry, Photointerpretation, and Digital Imaging and Mapping in Environmental Forensics, in: Murphy, B, & Morrison, R, Introduction To Environmental Forensics, Amsterdam: Academic Press. Available in the library's eBook Collection (EBSCOhost).
contact teaching
Wise, S. 2013 GIS Fundamentals
Heywood, Sarah Cornelius and Steve Carver. An introduction to geographical information systems. Harlow : Prentice Hall, 2002.
ArcGIS for Destop : http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/
QGIS: software downloading in own computers, exploring the functions of it with the course work data
The main teaching methods include contact teaching, exercises done in groups and individually, coursework, and exam. The exam will be held in the end of the course and it is mostly based on ArcGIS exercises.
Exam 50% : Open computer/book Tabula exam executed at TAMK in adp classroom by using ArcMap, assessment 1-5
Course work 30 %: compulsory, assessment by grade classes 1/3/5
Remote sensing (drone mapping, laser scanned data) issues will cover 20% of the whole grade, questions will be included in the gis Tabula exam.
English
10.09.2019 - 19.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
5 cr
16IDEE
15 - 25
Kalle Tammi, Eeva Sundström
Attendance at lectures in adp class is essential because the fundamentals of GIS is studied by ArcMap and also the coursework is carried out with that software.
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
1 cr
0-5
If you have work experience or studies on some other GIS software, please discuss alternative ways to do the course with the teacher(s).
The course exercises are related to the skills that environmental engineers commonly need in their working life.
10.12.2019 Tabula exam, carried out in adp class F1-31
17.12.2019 Retake, Tabula exam, carried out in adp class F1-31
Contact teaching and guided computer excercises approximately 50 h, self-study and excercises approximately 85 h. Total approximately 135 h.
Open file data and download services
Coordinate systems
Spatial data models, database management, visualization and thematic maps, searching functions, data entry, elementary proximity and overlay analysis
Environmental change observations based on different-aged aerial images
Satellite positioning
The student does not reach the level of satisfactory or does not do the exam neither the reports
The student can:
- download open file spatial data
- do the coordinate definitions
- separate vector and raster data from each others
- edit the appearance of the map objects and make thematic maps
- search map objects and save the results as separate files (layers)
- save and transfer data with gps device
- enter gps data into GIS
- explain the properties of aerial/satellite images and point cloud data
The student can in addition to previous mentioned:
- edit map objects and update attribute data
- utilize searching functions for efficient use of spatial data
- produce vector data
- rectify raster images
- maintain data of different coordinate systems gps data included
- visualise remote sensing data
The student can apply previous mentioned skills and elementary analysis tools in problem solving.
Student understands the basic concepts of geometry and vector calculations and is able to solve simple applications that are similar to the model problems solved during the course.
In addition, student is able to solve basic geometrical problems and knows how to apply vectors to technical problems. Student is also able to explain the methods of her/his solutions.
In addition, student has an overall understanding of using course topics to solve various applications and the ability to present and justify the chosen methods of solution.
Mika Nieminen
All study material will be available on the Tabula page of the course (tabula.tamk.fi) in pdf format.
lectures,
guided exercises
collaborative learning
homework
exam
Grading (0-5) is based on weekly exercises and final exam. Maximum score for the exam is 36 points, and additional points (max 3) are awarded for completing weekly homework exercises. To pass the course a student has to get at least 12 points in the exam.
English
30.09.2019 - 08.11.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
3 cr
19IENVE
Jukka Suominen
-
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
-
-
Exam: on 17th of November 2019
Re exams: on 11th of December 2019 and 15th of January 2020. Enrollment in Pakki.
-
Total work 81 hours.
lectures + guided exercises + collaborative learning 33 hours, exam 3 hours, rest 45 hours independent studying
Contents and corresponding dates can be found on Tabula.
Student doesn't pass the final exam.
Understanding of basic concepts.
Understanding of advanced concepts and ability to apply them in basic technical problems.
Ability to apply course topics in advanced problems.
Juha Tuominen
To be informed at the course start.
Each student is strongly encouraged on individual, preferably most focused, relevant data mining from any chosen source (dissertations / articles / magazines / literature / media / interviews / web)
Processive learning, interactive discussions, rehearsals (written & oral).
Can include also other type of activities
The course will be assessed based on the TAMK's general assessment criteria (=a method will be informed at course's start).
English
02.03.2020 - 12.05.2020
27.01.2020 - 24.02.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
18KVTBPT
18IDEE
25 - 35
Juha Tuominen
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No practical training is foreseen, but it is preferred, that participants actively promote during the entire course their connections and understanding. All the co-operative measures towards industrial, economic and business life such as direct contacts, interviews, data collecting or own work life practices are considered as additional value for course accomplishing.
An exam will be organised only upon joint agreement between responsible teacher and course attendants. Baseline is that there is no exam on this course.
It is preferred, that participants actively promote during the entire course their international connections and networking. Additionally can be agreed on separate arrangement for students to acquire special knowledge or information.
Course entity is thus planned that student's time consumption equals at each time Tamk's preset requirement. Face-to-face occurring class room educational activities is only a part of the students' work load. Another part student work is all the processing that takes via groups, e.g. in form of discussion, analytical processing of information and additionally fulfilling requirements set for individual work, reporting, presentations and overall performing given activities throughout the course. Third part students' work is individually performed data mining and principles of knowledge managing
Weekly lectures during entire course - however, changes to this may occur in some reasons. In such cases teacher usually informs students by email or other, jointly agreed manner.
Student has not participated adequately, the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report fails to comply with preset requirements / written report is quantitatively and qualitatively insufficient, nor does it meet the course learning objectives (Obs! any of these issues alone will lead to failed note = 0)
Student will achieve the minimum acceptable level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess basic knowledge & skills, parallelly presenting and emphasizing information relevant to objectives / regarding other requirements, please refer evaluations criteria (available in course Tabula)
Student will achieve the minimum acceptable level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess good knowledge & skills, parallelly combining already existing, original material with by themselves provided, value-adding information or knowledge / / regarding other requirements, please refer evaluations criteria (available in course Tabula)
Student will achieve the minimum acceptable level by: participating the minimum required amount on face-to-face classes / written report includes the essential content (ref: study plan) / student (or /-s) prove with their written output (both content and form) to possess exceptional knowledge & skills, parallelly combining already existing, original material with by themselves provided, value-adding information or knowledge in such a manner that this process will provide entirely new information (deductions, implications, applications, discoveries, summaries)/ / regarding other requirements, please refer evaluations criteria (available in course Tabula)
Jarmo Lilja
Most of the material is available in tabula.tamk.fi, some specific materials might only be available during lectures.
Contact teaching
Exercises
Co-operative learning
Computer simulations
Written report
Poster presentation
Assessment is based on exercise sets, modelling exercise and report, seminar presentation and exams. For both portions of the course:
Exercises are graded from 0 to 5, where 40 % of problems correctly solved gives grade 1 and 90 % gives grade 5 (exercises are not mandatory)
1 written report is graded from 1-5 (have to pass, details about grading from teachers)
1 exam is graded from 1 (40 % of points) to 5 (90 % of points) (have to pass)
In addition the seminar presentation is graded from 1 to 5. Seminar presentation is mandatory and also you need to be present as an opponent for another student giving the presentation. If you are not present as an opponent, there will be a penalty of -1 to your seminar grade. You will either give the presentation on noise modelling or on particle modelling.
Grade for both portions is calculated as an average of different graded tasks and the total grade of the course is an average of grades for two portions.
English
07.01.2020 - 30.04.2020
25.11.2019 - 14.01.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
30 - 35
Jarmo Lilja, Jari Puranen
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
N/A
N/A
Week 11 and 17, unless otherwise announced.
Noise modelling and fundamental concepts of sound 20 h
Particle dispersion fundamentals and modelling 20 h
Seminar presentation 3 h
Exams 4 h
Independent work 60 h
Student hasn't returned all required assignments, or student is unable to show adequate proficiency in noise and particle modelling. For example results from the modelling might be completely incorrect and out of this world or the student isn't able to solve any of the exam problems.
Student is able to analyse simple noise and particle modelling cases both qualitatively and quantitatively. Student needs extra support to be able to complete given tasks. Exercises have been done, but results might be erroneous.
Student is able to use correct terminology and presents justified qualitative and quantitative analysis. Exercises are done completely, and results and analysis are correct. Results are briefly commented.
Student shows the ability to do versatile qualitative and quantitative analysis. Student has a realistic knowledge of the limitations of the theoretical framework. Reports are comprehensive and well-structured. Student is able to show his or her own conclusions clearly.
Minna Nyström-Järvinen
English
07.01.2020 - 08.03.2020
25.11.2019 - 19.01.2020
3 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 35
Eveliina Asikainen, Minna Nyström-Järvinen
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Handouts ( and exercises) and additional material posted in Tabula
Books: Karen Timberlake & William Timberlake: Basic Chemistry, Pearson international edition
- Contact teaching
- exercises
- self study
- assignments
- laboratory exercises
- reporting
- exam
The course grade will form according to the points collected as follows:
- 5 short assignments (max 3 points/assignment), containing the home exercises
- 4 laboratory reports (max 5 points/report)
- Exam max. 30 points
Before starting the laboratories each student has to take a safety exam
Grading:
grade 0: 0-32 points; grade 1: 32,5-38,5 points; grade 2: 39-45 points; grade 3: 45,5-51,5 points; grade 4: 52-58 points; grade 5: 58,5-65 points
English
07.01.2020 - 24.04.2020
25.11.2019 - 31.01.2020
5 cr
20KVTBIOT
Maarit Korhonen, Kaisa Lahti
Bioproduct Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Exam 7.4.2020 (includes theory and labworks)
Retakes will be agreed later.
- Contact lessons 27 h
- Laboratory exercises 28 h
- Self-study
- Exams and feedback
Theory:
- chemical methods of analysis
- chemical reaction
- acids and bases
- oxidation and reduction
- gravimetric analysis
- Spectrometric analysis
Laboratory:
- Laboratory safety and working methods
- titrations
- Gravimetric labwork
- Spectrometric labwork
The student may not have taken the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and not participated in all laboratory work. Laboratory report/reports or homework are not returned. Student may not have participated in the exams.
Overall the achieved competence is insufficient.
The student took the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. All the reports and homework are returned. Student participated in the exams.
Overall the achieved competence is sufficient but narrow.
The student took the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. All the reports and homework are returned. Student participated in the exams. Overall the achieved competence is structural.
The student took the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. All the reports and homework are returned on time. Student participated in the exams with good results. Student has shown activity during the lesson. Overall the achieved competence is wide.
Hilda Szabo
English
02.03.2020 - 31.07.2020
27.01.2020 - 24.02.2020
15 cr
17IDEE
Hilda Szabo, Silja Kostia, Tuukka Tonteri
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Hilda Szabo
English
01.01.2020 - 31.07.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.01.2020
15 cr
16IDEE
Hilda Szabo, Silja Kostia, Tuukka Tonteri
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Noora Markkanen
Material available in Tabula.
Contact teaching, home assignments, excursion, group work and exam.
Grading is based on the assignments (20 points), group work (20 points) and exam (20 points).
Class participation can affect grading positively or negatively.
English
24.10.2019 - 31.12.2019
24.09.2019 - 21.10.2019
3 cr
17IDEE
25 - 35
Noora Markkanen
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
1 cr
0-5
No alternative implementation methods.
Excursion to one industrial production plant.
Exam is open in an electronic examination system EXAM between 29th of November and 20th of December.
International study group and excursion into international company.
21 hours of contact teaching and 60 hours of independent work.
The student has not participated the learning process in a planned way and / or reached the required level of knowledge during the course. Minimum 20 points is required to pass the course.
Student manages the assigned tasks under supervision. The student demonstrates weak knowledge in the exam and/or some of the course assignments are missing or show narrow or incomplete understanding of the topics.
Student is able to combine information from different sources, make conclusions and work responsibly. The student demonstrates great knowledge in the exam and / or the assignments show good understanding of of the topics.
Student is able to combine information from different sources, make excellent conclusions of various topics. Student works responsibly and in a committed manner considering the community and deadlines. The student demonstrates excellent knowledge in the exam and / or the assignments show excellent understanding of of the topics.
Knowledge of the most essential phenomena and related quantities and units in mechanics. Capability to analyse, when guided qualitatively and quantitatively simple cases related phenomena similar to discussed examples.
In addition capability to apply the principles to new situations. Can use the terminology and models in presentations of justified qualitative and quantitative analyses of phenomena
In addition versatile, fluent ability to analyse phenomena qualitatively and quantitaively realizing the limitations related to theories in use.
Mika Nieminen
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Randall D. Knight, Pearson, 3. or 4. Edition
Technical Formulas, Tammertekniikka
Lecture material on the Tabula site
demonstrations
independent e-learning
classroom teaching
exercises
cooperative learning
weekly exams and final exam
See Tabula for details.
English
27.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
3 cr
19IENVE
25 - 35
Sampo Saari
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Weekly tests are held approximately every four weeks. Weekly exams cannot be renewed. The exact updated schedule in the Tabula.
Resits can be found in Pakki.
More detailed schedule in Tabula.
Matti Kivimäki
English
11.03.2020 - 31.05.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.04.2020
3 cr
18IDEE
30 - 35
Seija Haapamäki, Matti Kivimäki
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Mika Nieminen
Randall Knight, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 2nd Edition, Pearson Education.
The weekly schedule and laboratory instructions available tabula.tamk.fi
Technical Formulas, Tammertekniikka, 2002
Contact teaching
Laboratory work
Report
Cooperative learning
Labs 1 - 4 Grading: 0...5
- 2 individual reports/person (meaning every second work for each student)
Lab 5 Own designed lab Grading 0...5
- Common poster, calculation sheet and presentation
Delivery times:
- 2 working weeks from the date of the measurements
- a delay will affect negatively on the grading
- the dead line is 4 working weeks from the date of measurements
Evaluation is based on the of the grades of the laboratory works. Each report is evaluated based on the work in the laboratory, results and the report (report is the most important one).
Participation to measurement classes and presentations is compulsory.
Detailed evaluation, see in tabula: "Evaluation of Environmental Physics Labs Version 2.0e"
If reports from several students are found to copies of each other (even partially), all those reports are disqualified, and students involved will need to perform new measurements for different laboratory assignments and write new reports from those measurements.
English
02.09.2019 - 15.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 08.09.2019
3 cr
18IDEE
Jari Puranen, Jarmo Lilja
Working: Measurements are done by working in pairs.
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No exams
- Introductions, guidance 9 h
- Laboratory measurements 15 h
- Poster presentation 3 h
- Independent work 54 h
Total 81 h
Missing works or reports.
Participation to all measurement classes and presentations is compulsory.
Reports have been done,methods and results have been presented, structure and analyses may have some shortages and can be partly erroneous. Discussion contains very few, simple conclusions.
Detailed evaluation, see in tabula: "Evaluation of Environmental Physics Labs Version 2.0e"
Participation to all measurement classes and presentations is compulsory.
Measurements and reports done in a normal way. Results and analyses are correct.
Reports have been done correctly according to the reporting standards of TAMK. Discussion contains some comments relevant comments relating to the results and applications.
Detailed evaluation, see in tabula: "Evaluation of Environmental Physics Labs Version 2.0e"
Participation to all measurement classes and presentations is compulsory.
Measurements and reports done with comprehensive, active, collaborative working. Results and analyses are correct. Structured, fluent, especially transparent text, vision of limitations and improvements, broad mature discussion and own conclusions related to the topics.
Detailed evaluation, see in tabula: "Evaluation of Environmental Physics Labs Version 2.0e"
Mika Nieminen
Course material is informed in Tabula. Partly it will be literature or internet based material, partly teacher’s own material and partly material made by student’s work groups during the course.
Lectures
Exercises and pair works or group works /seminars
End of the course –exam
Returned exercises
Activeness in lessons and group works
End of the course –exam, evaluation of the exam, 0 to 5
English
02.09.2019 - 10.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
4 cr
16IDEE
Sakari Lepola
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Participating the lessons is useful in any case and it is absolutely necessary, when making and presenting the pair works and/or group seminars. Active participation in group work is obligatory in this course.
The exam of the course will be carried out in the end of the course. The exact day will be clear during the end section of the course.
This course is very good possibility to build up international connections with other participants from different countries and from multicultural backgrounds.
Contact lessons in this course some 30-40 hours. Additional seminar work with own group 10-15 hours and one possible excursion, which takes app. one working day.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is normal, some absences are possible. The minimum requirement is to fully participate to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is good, some absences are possible. Student participates actively to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam with good marks.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is good, some absences are possible. Student participates actively to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam with excellent marks.
Hilda Szabo
English
02.03.2020 - 31.07.2020
27.01.2020 - 24.02.2020
15 cr
17IDEE
Hilda Szabo, Tuukka Tonteri
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Hilda Szabo
English
01.01.2020 - 31.07.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.01.2020
15 cr
16IDEE
Hilda Szabo, Tuukka Tonteri
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Mika Nieminen
Material provided in Tabula
Written tasks in Tabula and spoken tasks in class.
Discussions and workshops led by the students and the teacher.
The grade is given based on two electronic exams and a presentation plan
English
29.08.2019 - 04.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
3 cr
17IDEE
25 - 35
Taru Owston
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
The course supports the students in their worklife projects.
Electronic Examination taken in the time convinient for the student.
International group
Weekly sessions
Tasks in Tabula.
Preparing and giving a workshop.
)
Tasks are not completed or are plagiarised.
Tasks are completed. Can understand sentences and frequently used expressions related to areas of
most immediate relevance (e.g. very basic personal and family information,
shopping, local geography, employment). Can communicate in simple and
routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of information on
familiar and routine matters. Can describe in simple terms aspects of his/her
background, immediate environment and matters related to studies
Completes tasks as requested.Shows ability to differentiate between different text types.
Can understand the main ideas of complex text on both concrete and abstract topics, including technical discussions in his/her field of
specialisation. Can interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that
makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible without strain
for either party. Can produce clear, detailed text on a wide range of subjects
and explain a viewpoint on a topical issue giving the advantages and disadvantages of various options.
Completes tasks as requested. Shows ability to differentiate between different text types.
Can express him/herself
spontaneously, very fluently and precisely, differentiating finer shades of
meaning even in more complex situations.
Can understand a wide range of demanding, longer texts, and recognise
implicit meaning. Can express him/herself fluently and spontaneously
without much obvious searching for expressions. Can use language flexibly
and effectively for professional purposes. Can produce
clear, well-structured, detailed text on complex subjects, showing controlled
use of organisational patterns, connectors and cohesive devices.
Mika Nieminen
All material needed will be online / Tabula
Demonstrations, guided practicing, virtual studies, projects
Parts to be evaluated: two projects, quizes/exam, participation. Course grade will be based on these.
English
01.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
5 cr
18IDEE
Jaakko Aumala
For morel detailed information see tabula.tamk.fi
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Negotiable
Small quiz-activities during lessons or alternatively an exam, during the last lesson. Resits will be arranged as requested.
Lessons 4h / week, online learning 2h / week and projects with SketchUp (~10h) and AutoCAD (~15h)
SketchUp Make, AutoCAD basics and 2d, AutoCAD 3D solid modelling
Student did not accomplish all mandatory parts or student was absent more than 1/3 of the lessons.
Student has been able to do acceptable assignments and have participated lessons and done at least 2/3 of online quiz activities in the Tabula. Student knows the principles of SkethUp and AutoCAD software. Student is able to accomplish simple tasks following instructions but may need some guidance.
Student has earned average grades from assignments and quiz activities. Very detailed information about the grading of each assignment/quiz is found at Tabula. Student is able to do simple tasks with CAD-software individually and needs help only in solving advanced problems.
Student has earned excellent grades from activities. Detailed information about the grading of each assignment / quiz is found at Tabula. Student is able to accomplish demanding CAD-tasks including quite demanding problem solving. Student can provide help to other students as well.
Mika Nieminen
Horine, Gregory: Absolute Beginner's Guide To Project Management. Materials provided by teachers.
Lectures, group work, assignments.
Assessment is based on the project management assignments.
English
10.09.2019 - 18.10.2019
10.06.2019 - 03.09.2019
3 cr
17IDEE
25 - 35
Kai Hintsanen, Noora Markkanen
This course is taught in integration with a course 5N00CQ10-3020 Project Work. In other words students joining this course must also participate the 5N00CQ10-3020 Project Work course.
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No alternative completion methods.
Students' own projects have significant role in this course.
No exam.
-
6 x 3 hrs lectures
Independent and group work / project work 40 hrs.
Student fails to complete the given tasks in a given time frame. Has not been able to recognize the role and significance of project management and has shown inadequete ability to utilize tools and techniques of project management.
Student has completed all parts of the course and achieved competence is sufficient, but narrow. All assignments have been returned by the given deadlines. This grade represents some but modest understanding by the student in terms of using project management tools and techniques in a concrete project work.
Student has completed all parts of the course and achieved competence is structured and applied. All assignments have been returned by the given deadlines. This grade represents good understanding by the student in terms of using project management tools and techniques in a concrete project work.
Student has completed all parts of the course and achieved competence is wide, creative and developing. All assignments have been returned by the given deadlines. This grade represents close to professional level understanding by the student in terms of using project management tools and techniques in a concrete project work.
Erkki Kiviniemi
Materials are published digitally. Suggested reading for project management Horine, G.2005 Absolute Beginner's Guide to Project Management
Introductory lectures on project work, work in the project group
Evaluation focuses on the actual working in the project, and on its documentation. Evaluation is based on continuous observation during project work, individual and group reflection on the work, evaluation discussion in the end of the project and the client's feedback. Also the project plan and project report are used in evaluation.
Finnish
English
01.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 07.09.2019
5 cr
17I111
17IM
17I160
17I228K
17I132
17I190
17IDEE
17I575B
17LATE
17I575A
Risto Myllymäki, Anne Ojala, Eeva Sundström, Matti Peltola, Erkki Kiviniemi, Aino-Riitta Joutsen, Nina Kukkasniemi, Kaisa Lahti, Sakari Lepola, Noora Markkanen, Harri Laaksonen, Perttu Arminen, Marita Hiipakka, Petri Keto-Tokoi, Maarit Korhonen, Hilda Szabo, Päivi Viitaharju, Manne Viljamaa, Piia Kanto, Urpo Rossi
The course is based on realizing multiprofessional projects in working life and coaching project groups.
Laboratory Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
The course is implemented through true working life projects.
No exams
Some projects use English as working language or have international dimensions.
1 op ~ 27 study hours.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
The group does not have clear rules, the work proceeds mostly due to the coach's or clients activity. Project leader does not take responsibility on leading. Time and work management, and control is inadequate.
Members of project group focus on their own sub-tasks, co-operation between group members and with the client, and utilization of the group members' special skills is inadequate. Work load is unevenly divided between the group members. Project outcome is incomplete, or group's and client's judgement of the outcome differs significantly.
Group agrees on the rules with the assistance of coach, and mainly follows the agreed rules during the project. Project leader takes responsibility on the progress of the project, and takes care that each member can participate in the project work.
Group members work according to the agreed rules and project leader's guidelines. They listen to each other's opinions and co-operate with the client. Project members' commitment to the project varies in different phases.
Project outcome is in accordance with the task description. Group and client have quite similar opinions on the quality of the project work and its outcomes.
Group self-directively and collectively agrees on the rules and takes care that all group members follow them during the project.
The project leader takes appropriate responsibility, takes the group members' skills into account and leads the project with smoothly. Project leader finds creative solutions to enhanche good working atmosphere. Time and work load allocation is systematical and balanced.
Each group member works for accomplishing the project aims in co-operation with group members. All group members participate actively in all phases of the project. Group members listen to and respect others' opinions and competences. Group members co-operate with the client and adjust plans according to feed-back.
Project proceeds according to the timetable or the timetable (and or the aims) is adjusted in co-operation with the client. The project group is able to evaluate realistically the quality of outcome with regard to the project aims and is able to reflect the project work process.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
Eeva-Leena Tuominen
Finnish
English
01.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
5 cr
19LATEMM
Eeva-Leena Tuominen, Tuuli Välineva
Laboratory Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Erkki Kiviniemi
Materials are published digitally. Suggested reading for project management Horine, G.2005 Absolute Beginner's Guide to Project Management
Introductory lectures on project work, work in the project group
Evaluation focuses on the actual working in the project, and on its documentation. Evaluation is based on continuous observation during project work, individual and group reflection on the work, evaluation discussion in the end of the project and the client's feedback. Also the project plan and project report are used in evaluation.
Finnish
English
01.01.2020 - 22.05.2020
02.12.2019 - 19.01.2020
5 cr
18AI112
Matti Peltola, Erkki Kiviniemi, Sakari Lepola
The course is based on realizing multiprofessional projects in working life and coaching project groups.
Mechanical Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
5 cr
0-5
The course is implemented through true working life projects.
No exams
Some projects use English as working language or have international dimensions.
1 op ~ 27 study hours.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
The group does not have clear rules, the work proceeds mostly due to the coach's or clients activity. Project leader does not take responsibility on leading. Time and work management, and control is inadequate.
Members of project group focus on their own sub-tasks, co-operation between group members and with the client, and utilization of the group members' special skills is inadequate. Work load is unevenly divided between the group members. Project outcome is incomplete, or group's and client's judgement of the outcome differs significantly.
Group agrees on the rules with the assistance of coach, and mainly follows the agreed rules during the project. Project leader takes responsibility on the progress of the project, and takes care that each member can participate in the project work.
Group members work according to the agreed rules and project leader's guidelines. They listen to each other's opinions and co-operate with the client. Project members' commitment to the project varies in different phases.
Project outcome is in accordance with the task description. Group and client have quite similar opinions on the quality of the project work and its outcomes.
Group self-directively and collectively agrees on the rules and takes care that all group members follow them during the project.
The project leader takes appropriate responsibility, takes the group members' skills into account and leads the project with smoothly. Project leader finds creative solutions to enhanche good working atmosphere. Time and work load allocation is systematical and balanced.
Each group member works for accomplishing the project aims in co-operation with group members. All group members participate actively in all phases of the project. Group members listen to and respect others' opinions and competences. Group members co-operate with the client and adjust plans according to feed-back.
Project proceeds according to the timetable or the timetable (and or the aims) is adjusted in co-operation with the client. The project group is able to evaluate realistically the quality of outcome with regard to the project aims and is able to reflect the project work process.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
Tuukka Tonteri
Material will be delivered by Course Tabula. Tabula passwords and other information will be dealt on Introduction Session.
- Contact teaching, some mandatory sessions
- visiting lecturers lectures
- essay writing
- group work (an interview task and gathering the results)
- exam
Assessment of divisions is counted based on weighting:
Activity and Daily Tasks 20%, and Assignments, Exam and Participation on Guest Lecturer’s Sessions 80%
English
07.01.2020 - 08.03.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.01.2020
3 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
25 - 35
Tiiti Kämäri, Tuukka Tonteri
To pass the course a student needs to pass the Assignments and the exam:
Assignments, 2 Assignments, instructed in Tabula, compulsory for everyone to pass the course, graded:
1. Interview Assignment (pair work) instructed in Tabula, compulsory for everyone, includes participation to the Workshop and presentation. Check-up meeting for the progress of this Assignment is mandatory.
Interview Assignment (pair work) includes participation to the Workshop and presentation.
2. Group work Assignment and Presentation, compulsory for everyone.
Final Exam, (in paper), compulsory for everyone.
Daily Tasks, instructed on the lecture, voluntary, graded. Participants need to be named in the delivery. Daily tasks affect positively to your grading.
Assignments and Tasks will be returned to Tabula according to the schedule. URKUND plagiation protection program will be used in Tabula.
Exam informed in Exams and Re-exams.
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Exam during the week nr 8 /2019.
Re-exam agreed on the Introduction Session.
Assignments will be partly accomphed with international contacts.
Allocation of working time:
total 81 h, equals worth 3 credits of a student’s work
out of which contact teaching: Introduction, theory, workshops and exam, exam return and feedback 29 h,
and tasks, assignments and self-study, 52 h
During the 3rd period:
Mandatory Introduction lesson during week nr 2 /2019. according to Study Schedule.
Exam during the week nr 8 / 2019, and feedback session during the week nr 12/ 2019 (after Spring holiday) .
Grade 1-2
General
Student understands the purpose of public administration from the point of both society and individual, importance of administrative processes and the basic principles of good administration, and he/she is able to find information to be applied. Student is able to define the juridical status of an individual and principles of jurisdiction. Student knows the environmental administration sources concerning national and European administration. Student knows the principles of public participation and is able to apply some of them in environmental cases.
Student understands the importance of group work and treating group members in a constructive manner. She/He partly understands the importance of meeting deadlines and participating the arranged opportunities to meet Guest Lecturers of the course.
Student is able to present his/her own questions concerning the public administration and public participation.
The student knows some benefits of participatory methods and some methods, but is not able to connect the purpose of the process and the choice of methods in an analytical way.
Assignment contents and structure
Student is able to deliver the Assignments mainly following the instructions given, and she/he is able to return the assignments as per scheduled. Student is able to express her/his thoughts concerning Public Administration and Participation topics using some concepts of the topic in English, and student understands the meaning of producing the content of assignments by herself/himself; in other words, the documents produced contain student’s own thoughts and opinions on the given topic. Student is mainly able to follow the TAMK Reporting Guide instructions.
Grade 3-4
General
Student understands the purpose of public administration from the point of both society and individual, importance of administrative processes and the basic principles of good administration, and he/she is able to find information to be applied. Student is able to define the juridical status of an individual and principles of jurisdiction. Student knows the environmental administration sources concerning national and European administration. Student knows the principles of public participation and is able to apply some of them in environmental cases.
Student understands the importance of group work and treating group members in a constructive manner. She/He partly understands the importance of meeting deadlines and participating the arranged opportunities to meet Guest Lecturers of the course. She/He understands the importance of participating in contact sessions and using the arranged opportunities to meet Guest Lecturers of the course.
Student is able to present his/her own questions concerning the public administration and public participation.
The student is able to describe benefits of using participatory methods. She/he is able to identify some participant groups and interest and propose suitable commonly used methods.
Assingnment contents and structure
Student is able to deliver the Assignments following the instructions given, and she/he is able to return the assignments as per scheduled. Student is able to express her/his thoughts concerning Public Administration and Participation topics applying some core concepts in English, and student understands the meaning of producing the content of assignments by herself/himself; in other words, the documents produced contain student’s own argumented thoughts and opinions on the given topic. Student is able to follow the TAMK Reporting Guide instructions considering the Assignments.
Grade 5
General
Student understands the purpose of public administration from the point of both society and individual, importance of administrative processes and the basic principles of good administration, and she/he is able to apply the knowledge gained when doing assignments. Student is able to apply the knowledge gained during the course when defining the juridical status of an individual and principles of jurisdiction. Student is able to apply the environmental administration sources case specific concerning national and European administration, and she/he knows the sources of information on the subject area. Student knows the principles of public participation and is able to apply them in environmental cases.
Student understands the importance of group work and treating group members in a constructive manner. She/He understands the importance of participating in contact sessions and using the arranged opportunities to meet Guest Lecturers of the course.
Student knows to value discussing the topics and participating the group work allocated during the sessions, meeting deadlines and participating the arranged opportunities to meet Guest Lecturers of the course.
Student is able to apply the knowledge by presenting his/her own questions, interpretations and examples.
The student understands the importance for arranging successful participation in a planning or administrative process. The student is able to identify relevant participant groups and their interests. She/he is able propose well-argued and creative set of methods which form a coherent participatory process.
Assignment contents and structure
Student is able to do the given Assignments following the instructions given, and she/he is able to return the assignments as per scheduled. Student is able to express her/his thoughts concerning Public Administration and Participation topics applying appropriate concepts in good English, and student understands the meaning of producing the content of assignments by herself/himself; in other words, the documents produced contain student’s own well argumented thoughts and opinions on the given topic. Student is able to follow the TAMK Reporting Guide instructions.
Hilda Szabo
English
07.01.2020 - 30.05.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.01.2020
5 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
18KVTBPT
30 - 45
Juha Mettälä
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Noora Markkanen
Material available in Tabula. In addition recommended reading:
IEA. 2016. World Energy Outlook 2016. Executive summary.
OECD/IEA & FAO. 2017. How2Guide for Bioenergy. Roadmap Development and Implementation. IEA Publications.
The course consists of lectures by different professionals who present different renewable energy technologies. The course includes contact teaching, assignments and an exam.
The quality of assignments, exam and participation.
English
01.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 02.09.2019
5 cr
16IDEE
30 - 35
Eero Kulmala, Aki Korpela, Sakari Lepola, Noora Markkanen, Perttu Arminen
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No alternative ways to complete the course. Participation to the lectures is an important part of the implementation.
The exam will be carried out at the end of the course during 12th-18th of December. Exact date will be agreed during the course.
International study group
45h of contact teaching, 90h individual learning
Some of the assignments not submitted or accepted and / or the achieved competence is insufficient. Participation is not sufficient.
All assignments are accepted. Achieved competence is sufficient, but narrow. Participation to the lectures is weak.
All assignments are accepted or well done. Achieved competence represents fluent understanding on the core concepts, renewable energy technologies and processes. Participation to the lectures is good.
All assignments are well done. Achieved competence represents excellent understanding on the core concepts, renewable energy technologies and processes. Participation to the lectures is very good.
Mika Nieminen
Teaching materials will be announced during the course. Lecture materials can be accessed via Tabula.
Contact teaching during the lectures, self-study/distance learning, assignments, presentations and practical work.
Course will be evaluated based on exam (50%) and group work (50%).
English
21.10.2019 - 31.12.2019
16.09.2019 - 03.11.2019
3 cr
17IDEE
25 - 35
Marileena Mäkelä
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No alternative ways of completing the course.
The exam will be organized through the TAMK's electronic examination service (exam room, "Tenttiterraario"). Students will be informed about the exam schedule during the course.
Contact teaching (approx. 20 h) and seminars (approx. 6 h), self-study approx. 55 h. Approximately 81 h in total.
Process of risk management, Occupational health and safety risks, Environmental risks, Chemical risks, Personnel risks
Mika Nieminen
Materials will be available in Tabula.
Contact teaching, class exercises and home assignments. Self-evaluation.
Evaluation is based on the activity throughout the course and the quality of the assignments. 66% of the grade is based on the accepted assignments and 33% is based on active attendance.
English
24.10.2019 - 31.12.2019
24.09.2019 - 22.10.2019
3 cr
17IDEE
25 - 35
Hilda Szabo, Noora Markkanen
Participation on the first contact lesson is mandatory part of the course.
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No alternative methods for implementation.
-
No exam. Evaluation is based on the activity throughout the course and the quality of the assignments.
-
24h of contact teaching and 57h of individual work.
Contact teaching 3h per week. 5 times with Noora and 3 times with Hilda.
Student has not submitted all the required assignments.
The submissions show narrow or incomplete understanding of thesis process, reporting guidelines, literature research, knowledge of different research methodologies and reporting.
The submissions show good understanding of thesis process, reporting guidelines, literature research, knowledge of different research methodologies and reporting.
The submissions show excellent understanding of thesis process, reporting guidelines, literature research, knowledge of different research methodologies and reporting.
Student can identify and define core concepts and phenomena and different interactions in soils. Student has basic understanding in defined themes of the course.
Student has basic skills in soil sampling and analyses in practice when instructed and supervised.
Student can work in a group of course assignments, recognises the significance of the course theme in the professional field and can assess the significance of the theme from his/her viewpoint.
Student can explain the core concepts and phenomena and different interactions in soils and connect them into practice. Student has understanding in annually defined themes of the course and can apply these into practical applications.
Student can apply the skills in soil sampling and analyses, design tests for these studies and justify his/her choices.
Student can cooperate responsibly in the course theme assignments, commit to the group activities and assess the significance of the theme broadly.
Student can understand extensively the core concepts and phenomena and different interactions in soils and connect them into practice. Student has analytical understanding in annually defined themes of the course and can apply and develop these in practical applications.
Student has skills to compare and apply the most appropriate skills in soil sampling and analyses, design tests for these studies, justify his/her choices and suggest alternative ways of implementation.
Student can cooperate responsibly and constructively in the course theme assignments, commit to the group activities, assess the significance of the theme broadly and understands the effects of the work.
Mika Nieminen
Coleman, David C. ; Crossley, D. A. ; Hendrix, Paul F. 2004. Fundamentals of soil ecology Elsevier Academic Press cop. Can be found from Ebrary -e-book database.
Murphy, B. W., Hazelton, P. A 2007. Interpreting Soil Test Results: What Do All the Numbers Mean? Collingwood, VIC : CSIRO Publishing. 2007, Can be found from EbscoHost -e-book database.
Reddy, R.N. 2010. Soil Engineering. Design, testing and remediation. Global Media.
Can be found from Ebrary -e-book database.
Terzaghi, Karl; Peck, Ralph B.; Mesri, Gholamreza. 1996. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice (3rd Ed)1996 John Wiley & Sons.
Can be found from Knovel E-book database
Handouts and e-material given during the course.
Contact teaching, field and laboratory experiments, demonstrations, exercises, calculations.
English
30.08.2019 - 20.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 14.09.2019
4 cr
19IENVE
25 - 35
Tiiti Kämäri, Anne Kasari
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Not available.
Final exam in November 2019. Retake exams will be agreed separately and held in the beginning of 2020. Check the Tabula page for updated course information.
Anne's part of the course is based on 2 short exams in Tabula. Check when they are available.
Contact lessons and laboratory exercises 50 h
Self-study (reports, exercises, exam) 58 hours
total 108 hours
The course schedule will be available in Tabula.
Mika Nieminen
English
02.09.2019 - 20.10.2019
10.06.2019 - 08.09.2019
3 cr
18IDEE
Jukka Suominen
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Knowledge and understanding of the core concepts, processes and phenomena of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Student has basic skills in water sampling and study of basic physico-chemical and biological parameters of freshwater and ability to do the analyses in practise when instructed and supervised. Basic theoretical knowledge and understanding in limnology, forestry and bioindicator studies.
Student manages the assigned tasks under supervision and is able to do routine operations. Student knows courses of action but cannot necessarily justify his/her choices.
Student can give and receive feedback and can work in a group. Student is able to consider and assess the topics from his/her viewpoint. Student takes responsibility for his/her own work. Student can describe sustainability related effects of his/her own work related to structure and function of ecosystems.
Student is able to apply, explain and compare the basic concepts, processes and phenomena of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Student has sufficient skills and ability in independent water sampling and study of basic physico-chemical and biological parameters of freshwater and ability to do the analyses in practise independently. Student has fluent theoretical knowledge and understanding in limnology, forestry and bioindicator studies. Student is also able to structure things in relation to one another.
Motivation and interest towards the subject expressed clearly. Student can select the most appropriate course of action from different sampling or indicator options and justify his/her choices. In practice, this means that the student is able apply his/her skills and make plans accordingly. Student is able to limit tasks and solve problems during the course.
Student can give and receive feedback actively and constructively. Student is able to consider and assess the topics both from his/her and the close community’s viewpoint. Student can cooperate responsibly and is ready to develop his/her interaction skills. Student recognizes and follows the important courses of action in the field. Student takes responsibility and commits to the group activities in addition to his/her own work. Can describe and assess the sustainability related effects of his/her own work in relation to structure and function of ecosystems.
Student understands extensive entities and relations between them, and is able to generalize, analyze and relate ecological information to the professional context. Student has fluent knowledge and understanding of the basic concepts, processes and phenomena of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. In addition, the student is able to apply the knowledge in new situations. Sufficient skills and ability in independent water sampling and study of basic physico-chemical and biological parameters of freshwater and ability to do the analyses in practise independently. Ability to make suggestions for developing and/or improving these methods. Student has fluent theoretical knowledge and understanding in limnology, forestry and bioindicator studies.
Motivation and high interest towards the subject and developing oneself in these fields. Student can search for diverse courses of action and solution alternatives for ecological issues and sampling, justify his/her choices and try new courses of action. Student is also able to assess diverse alternatives, combine solution alternatives creatively or creates new ones.
Student uses feedback systematically as a professional growth tool in his/her own work and the community. Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task. Student can cooperate responsibly, flexibly and constructively, and develops his/her own and the group’s interaction. Student works responsibly and in a committed manner considering the community and field requirements and needs. Student understands the sustainability related effects of his/her work and can anticipate them in his/her work in relation to contaminated site remediation.
Tiiti Kämäri
Handouts and e-material given during the course.
Contact teaching, field and laboratory experiments, demonstrations, exercises and calculations.
The evaluation of the course is based on continuous evaluation:
Learning outcomes that are based on the knowledge and skills achieved with the course assignments, exercises, reports based on them and exam.
The final grade consists of the following elements:
- Exam, 30 %
- Essay, 30 %
- Field work and report, 20 %
- Bioindicator study and report, 20 %
English
07.01.2020 - 31.05.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.01.2020
4 cr
19IENVE
30 - 35
Seija Haapamäki, Marja-Liisa Timperi, Tiiti Kämäri
All lecture materials are distributed via the Tabula.
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering, Open University of Applied Sciences
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Exam will be organized during the weeks 18-19, the exact date and time will be announced later. Possible re-exams will be announced later.
One or two lectures will be given by an international guest lecturer. Names and topics will be announced during the course.
Contact teaching, field work and laboratory exercises 36-44 hours, self-study (reports, exercises, exam) 64-72 hours. Approximately 108 hours in total. Given hours are approximates and are based on general guidelines.
Hilda Szabo
English
07.01.2020 - 31.05.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.01.2020
6 cr
20KVIENVE
18KVTBPT
18IDEE
35 - 45
Anne Ojala, Hilda Szabo
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Finnish
02.09.2019 - 21.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 13.09.2019
2 cr
16I228A
16I132
16I131
Katri Kallinen, Reijo Mäkelä
Vehicle Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Joni Sallila: Protocall – Teknikbiten, Tammertekniikka 2016.
Ammattialakohtaiset tekstit ilmoitetaan kurssin aikana.
Tabulasivu. (not translated)
Lähiopetus, harjoitukset, tentti, itsenäinen verkko-opiskelu, alkutesti (not translated)
Asteikko 0-5. Kokeet ja tuntiaktiivisuus. Lähiopetuksen läsnäolovaatimus: 80 %. (not translated)
Finnish
02.09.2019 - 15.12.2019
01.08.2019 - 15.12.2019
2 cr
17I800
Joni Sallila
Esitiedot Lukion ruotsi tai vastaava kielitaito. B1-tason kielitaito.
Oppimistavoitteet: Opiskelijalla on sellainen koulutusohjelman mukainen ruotsin kielen kirjallinen ja suullinen taito, joka ammatin harjoittamisen ja ammatillisen kehityksen kannalta on tarpeellinen.
Opiskelija selviytyy oman ammattialansa kirjallisista ja suullisista tehtävistä pohjoismaissa sekä kaksikielisellä alueella Suomessa.
Opiskelija osaa kertoa työympäristöstään sekä oman alansa toiminnoista.
Tieto virtuaalisuudesta opiskelijalle: Osittainen verkkototeutus. (not translated)
TAMK Languages and Communication
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Kielioppitesti xx.xx.2019
Kirjallinen koe: xx.xx.2019
Suullinen koe: xx.xx.2019
Liiketoiminta ja palvelut (sis.kielet) -uusintatentti xx.xx.2020 16.30 - 19.30
Liiketoiminta ja palvelut (sis.kielet) -uusintatentti xx.xx.2020 16.30 - 19.30 (not translated)
Kommunikaatiotilanteet: puhelin, s-posti, lentokenttä, tehdasalue, tapaaminen, ihmisten esittely toisilleen, tekniikan alat, tienneuvominen, kysyminen, taulukoista kertominen, asennusmanuaalien terminologiaa, vian etsiminen, hotellissa asuminen, tuotekuvaus, neuvottelu, tehdaskierros, ravintola.
Ammattialakohtaiset lisätekstit. Peruskieliopin kertaus + kielioppitesti. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa pääosin ymmärrettävästi mutta lyhyesti ja yksipuolisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa. Opiskelija osaa hankkia ja ymmärtää oman tekniikan alansa tietoa helppolukuisista lähteistä.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä yksinkertaisesti keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä selviytyy pääosin ymmärrettävästi tavallisimmista keskusteluista.
Opiskelija osaa toimia ennakoitavissa toimenkuvansa vaatimissa työelämäkontakteissa, esim. sähköpostiviestit, reklamaatiot, puhelintilanteet ja raportoinnit.
Opiskelija osaa tulkita oman alansa yksinkertaisia teknisiä ohjeistuksia ja laatia niitä pääosin ymmärrettävästi. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa keskeiset asiat koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään eheänä kokonaisuutena esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman tekniikan alansa tietoa keskeisimmistä lähteistä ja seurata oman alansa kehitystä yleisellä tasolla.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä keskustella näistäaiheista.
Opiskelija osaa hoitaa keskeisimpiä toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköpostiviestejä, reklamaatioita, puhelintilanteita ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa laatia ja ymmärtää oman alansa teknisiä ohjeistuksia melko hyvin. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa monipuolisesti ja tarkoituksenmukaisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa itsenäisesti ja monipuolisesti hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman tekniikan alansa tietoa ja seurata alansa ammatillista kehitystä laaja-alaisesti.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä sujuvasti yritysten ja organisaatioiden toimintaa, tuotteita, prosesseja ja palveluita sekä keskustella aloitteellisesti näistä aiheista. Opiskelija osaa hoitaa vaivattomasti ja asianmukaisesti toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja,
esim. sähköpostiviestejä, reklamaatioita, puhelintilanteita ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa ymmärtää vaikeuksitta ja laatia selkeitä oman alansa teknisiä ohjeistuksia. (not translated)
Markus Aho
Finnish
01.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 13.09.2019
2 cr
17AI112
Reijo Mäkelä
Mechanical Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Jarkko Lehtonen
Finnish
02.09.2019 - 31.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 13.09.2019
2 cr
17I210
Reijo Mäkelä
Electrical and Automation Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Jarkko Lehtonen
Finnish
02.09.2019 - 21.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 13.09.2019
2 cr
17I230
Katri Kallinen, Reijo Mäkelä
Electrical and Automation Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Mika Nieminen
Joni Sallila: Protocall – Teknikbiten, Tammertekniikka 2016.
Ammattialakohtaiset tekstit ilmoitetaan kurssin aikana.
Tabulasivu. (not translated)
Lähiopetus, harjoitukset, tentti, itsenäinen verkko-opiskelu, alkutesti (not translated)
Asteikko 0-5. Kokeet ja tuntiaktiivisuus. Lähiopetuksen läsnäolovaatimus: 80 %. (not translated)
Finnish
02.09.2019 - 15.12.2019
01.08.2019 - 15.12.2019
2 cr
18IDEE
Joni Sallila
Esitiedot Lukion ruotsi tai vastaava kielitaito. B1-tason kielitaito.
Oppimistavoitteet: Opiskelijalla on sellainen koulutusohjelman mukainen ruotsin kielen kirjallinen ja suullinen taito, joka ammatin harjoittamisen ja ammatillisen kehityksen kannalta on tarpeellinen.
Opiskelija selviytyy oman ammattialansa kirjallisista ja suullisista tehtävistä pohjoismaissa sekä kaksikielisellä alueella Suomessa.
Opiskelija osaa kertoa työympäristöstään sekä oman alansa toiminnoista.
Tieto virtuaalisuudesta opiskelijalle: Osittainen verkkototeutus. (not translated)
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Kielioppitesti xx.xx.2019
Kirjallinen koe: xx.xx.2019
Suullinen koe: xx.xx.2019
Liiketoiminta ja palvelut (sis.kielet) -uusintatentti xx.xx.2020 16.30 - 19.30
Liiketoiminta ja palvelut (sis.kielet) -uusintatentti xx.xx.2020 16.30 - 19.30 (not translated)
Kommunikaatiotilanteet: puhelin, s-posti, lentokenttä, tehdasalue, tapaaminen, ihmisten esittely toisilleen, tekniikan alat, tienneuvominen, kysyminen, taulukoista kertominen, asennusmanuaalien terminologiaa, vian etsiminen, hotellissa asuminen, tuotekuvaus, neuvottelu, tehdaskierros, ravintola.
Ammattialakohtaiset lisätekstit. Peruskieliopin kertaus + kielioppitesti. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa pääosin ymmärrettävästi mutta lyhyesti ja yksipuolisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa. Opiskelija osaa hankkia ja ymmärtää oman tekniikan alansa tietoa helppolukuisista lähteistä.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä yksinkertaisesti keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä selviytyy pääosin ymmärrettävästi tavallisimmista keskusteluista.
Opiskelija osaa toimia ennakoitavissa toimenkuvansa vaatimissa työelämäkontakteissa, esim. sähköpostiviestit, reklamaatiot, puhelintilanteet ja raportoinnit.
Opiskelija osaa tulkita oman alansa yksinkertaisia teknisiä ohjeistuksia ja laatia niitä pääosin ymmärrettävästi. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa keskeiset asiat koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään eheänä kokonaisuutena esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman tekniikan alansa tietoa keskeisimmistä lähteistä ja seurata oman alansa kehitystä yleisellä tasolla.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä keskustella näistäaiheista.
Opiskelija osaa hoitaa keskeisimpiä toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköpostiviestejä, reklamaatioita, puhelintilanteita ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa laatia ja ymmärtää oman alansa teknisiä ohjeistuksia melko hyvin. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa monipuolisesti ja tarkoituksenmukaisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa itsenäisesti ja monipuolisesti hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman tekniikan alansa tietoa ja seurata alansa ammatillista kehitystä laaja-alaisesti.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä sujuvasti yritysten ja organisaatioiden toimintaa, tuotteita, prosesseja ja palveluita sekä keskustella aloitteellisesti näistä aiheista. Opiskelija osaa hoitaa vaivattomasti ja asianmukaisesti toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja,
esim. sähköpostiviestejä, reklamaatioita, puhelintilanteita ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa ymmärtää vaikeuksitta ja laatia selkeitä oman alansa teknisiä ohjeistuksia. (not translated)
Jouko Lähteenmäki
Finnish
02.09.2019 - 21.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 13.09.2019
2 cr
17I351
Katri Kallinen
TAMK Languages and Communication
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Finnish
02.09.2019 - 21.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 13.09.2019
2 cr
16I228A
16I132
16I131
Katri Kallinen, Reijo Mäkelä
Vehicle Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
1 cr
0-5
Markus Aho
Finnish
01.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 13.09.2019
2 cr
17AI112
Reijo Mäkelä
Mechanical Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Jarkko Lehtonen
Finnish
01.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 13.09.2019
2 cr
17I210
Reijo Mäkelä
Electrical and Automation Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Jarkko Lehtonen
Finnish
02.09.2019 - 21.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 13.09.2019
2 cr
17I230
Katri Kallinen, Reijo Mäkelä
Electrical and Automation Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
1 cr
0-5
Mika Nieminen
Joni Sallila: Protocall – Teknikbiten, Tammertekniikka 2016.
Ammattialakohtaiset tekstit ilmoitetaan kurssin aikana.
Tabulasivu. (not translated)
Lähiopetus, harjoitukset, tentti, itsenäinen verkko-opiskelu, alkutesti (not translated)
Asteikko 0-5. Kokeet ja tuntiaktiivisuus. Lähiopetuksen läsnäolovaatimus: 80 %. (not translated)
Finnish
02.09.2019 - 15.12.2019
01.08.2019 - 15.12.2019
2 cr
18IDEE
Joni Sallila
Esitiedot Lukion ruotsi tai vastaava kielitaito. B1-tason kielitaito.
Oppimistavoitteet: Opiskelijalla on sellainen koulutusohjelman mukainen ruotsin kielen kirjallinen ja suullinen taito, joka ammatin harjoittamisen ja ammatillisen kehityksen kannalta on tarpeellinen.
Opiskelija selviytyy oman ammattialansa kirjallisista ja suullisista tehtävistä pohjoismaissa sekä kaksikielisellä alueella Suomessa.
Opiskelija osaa kertoa työympäristöstään sekä oman alansa toiminnoista.
Tieto virtuaalisuudesta opiskelijalle: Osittainen verkkototeutus. (not translated)
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Kielioppitesti xx.xx.2019
Kirjallinen koe: xx.xx.2019
Suullinen koe: xx.xx.2019
Liiketoiminta ja palvelut (sis.kielet) -uusintatentti xx.xx.2020 16.30 - 19.30
Liiketoiminta ja palvelut (sis.kielet) -uusintatentti xx.xx.2020 16.30 - 19.30 (not translated)
Kommunikaatiotilanteet: puhelin, s-posti, lentokenttä, tehdasalue, tapaaminen, ihmisten esittely toisilleen, tekniikan alat, tienneuvominen, kysyminen, taulukoista kertominen, asennusmanuaalien terminologiaa, vian etsiminen, hotellissa asuminen, tuotekuvaus, neuvottelu, tehdaskierros, ravintola.
Ammattialakohtaiset lisätekstit. Peruskieliopin kertaus + kielioppitesti. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa pääosin ymmärrettävästi mutta lyhyesti ja yksipuolisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa. Opiskelija osaa hankkia ja ymmärtää oman tekniikan alansa tietoa helppolukuisista lähteistä.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä yksinkertaisesti keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä selviytyy pääosin ymmärrettävästi tavallisimmista keskusteluista.
Opiskelija osaa toimia ennakoitavissa toimenkuvansa vaatimissa työelämäkontakteissa, esim. sähköpostiviestit, reklamaatiot, puhelintilanteet ja raportoinnit.
Opiskelija osaa tulkita oman alansa yksinkertaisia teknisiä ohjeistuksia ja laatia niitä pääosin ymmärrettävästi. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa keskeiset asiat koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään eheänä kokonaisuutena esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman tekniikan alansa tietoa keskeisimmistä lähteistä ja seurata oman alansa kehitystä yleisellä tasolla.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä keskustella näistäaiheista.
Opiskelija osaa hoitaa keskeisimpiä toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköpostiviestejä, reklamaatioita, puhelintilanteita ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa laatia ja ymmärtää oman alansa teknisiä ohjeistuksia melko hyvin. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa monipuolisesti ja tarkoituksenmukaisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa itsenäisesti ja monipuolisesti hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman tekniikan alansa tietoa ja seurata alansa ammatillista kehitystä laaja-alaisesti.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä sujuvasti yritysten ja organisaatioiden toimintaa, tuotteita, prosesseja ja palveluita sekä keskustella aloitteellisesti näistä aiheista. Opiskelija osaa hoitaa vaivattomasti ja asianmukaisesti toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja,
esim. sähköpostiviestejä, reklamaatioita, puhelintilanteita ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa ymmärtää vaikeuksitta ja laatia selkeitä oman alansa teknisiä ohjeistuksia. (not translated)
Jouko Lähteenmäki
Finnish
02.09.2019 - 21.12.2019
02.07.2019 - 13.09.2019
2 cr
17I351
Katri Kallinen
TAMK Languages and Communication
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
1 cr
0-5
Silja Kostia
material found in Tabula
Lectures, discussions, assignments, presentations, excursions, learning diary, laboratory
Min attendance to the lectures is 60 % and laboratory work 100 %.
Anne Kasari's part (20%) of the course is evaluated by the activity in the lessons and short tests (in Tabula) after lectures are over.
Satu Kuutti's part (20 %) of the course is evaluated by the activity of the lessons, short tests and learning diary.
Silja Kosti's part (20 %) of the course is defined later on.
Rest of the grade is based on the presentation (20 %), laboratory work and report (20 %). All the reports, diaries or other tasks/quizzes etc returned late will decrease the final grade.
English
07.01.2020 - 31.05.2020
25.11.2019 - 07.01.2020
5 cr
20KVIENVE
18KVTBPT
18IDEE
30 - 40
Satu Kuutti, Seija Haapamäki, Anne Kasari, Silja Kostia
Tabula is the communication channel, place for assignment submissions and course materials through the course.
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
no alternative ways to conduct the course
excursions, details told later
no exam, but short quizzes in Tabula
international study group
5cr = 135 hours of work
Attendance to lectures (including excursions) is less than 60 % and laboratory work less than 100 % or any of the following is missing: presentations, learning diary, laboratory work report, short tests (quizzes) undone or failed.
Minimum attendance requirements fullfilled and other given tasks done in a satisfactory level. In this case the average knowledge of the taught subjects is in the basic level.
The student shows understanding of the waste management systems and the student is able to apply some of the knowledge gained during the course when doing the assignments. The student is able to express thoughts and reflections in his/her learning diary. The student knows group work skills. The student is able to utilize the possibility for co-operation and collective learning by participating the lectures, excursions and group works. The students is able to work according to instructions given and by meeting the deadlines.
The student shows understanding of the waste management systems and the student is able to apply the knowledge gained during the course when doing the assignments. The student is able to analytically express thoughts and reflections in his/her learning diary. The student knows excellent group work skills. The student is able to utilize the possibility for co-operation and collective learning by participating the lectures, excursions and group works in an active manner. The students is able to work according to instructions given and by meeting the deadlines.
Mika Nieminen
Handouts posted in Tabula
Textbook: George Tchobanoglous and Edward D. Schroeder: Water Quality
Contact teaching, field excursion, assignments, exam
The course consists of lectures and discussions, exercises, field excursion of which students write report, compulsory laboratory exercises (3) and exam. Together these form the course grade as follows:
short assignments max. 40 points; laboratory reports max. 30 points; exam max. 30 points
Grade 0: 0-29 points; grade 1: 30-44 points; grade 2: 45-59 points; grade 3:60-74 points; grade 4: 75-89 points; grade 5: 90-100 points.
English
03.09.2019 - 09.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
5 cr
17IDEE
25 - 32
Seija Haapamäki, Hilda Szabo
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Exam at the end of the course.
Contact lectures 28 h
Laboratory exercises 14 h
Drinking water treatment plant visit 4h
Self study (pretasks, assignments, laboratory reports) 89 h
Total 135 h
Concept of water and wastewater management, sources of water, use of water, characteristics of water and their significance from environmental health point of view, unit operations used in water and wastewater treatment, drinking water production, wastewater treatment, alternative wastewater management options and future perspectives.
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is insufficient.
This means that
-some of the assignments were done acceptably
-the student is not familiar with the basic concepts discussed during the course
-can perform the laboratory measurements and experiments under supervision
-has no basic skills in reporting the results of the measurements and experiments
-seldom and inactive participation in the lectures
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is sufficient but narrow.
This means that
-some of the assignments were done acceptably
-the student is familiar with the basic concepts discussed during the course but often makes mistakes when applying them
-can perform the laboratory measurements and experiments under supervision
-has basic skills in reporting the results of the measurements and experiments
-seldom and inactive participation in the lectures
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is structural.
This means that:
-most of the assignments were done and accepted
-exam shows that the student is familiar with the concepts discussed during the course and can apply them in most of the situations
-is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly
-can perform laboratory measurements and experiments independently
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student attends to apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is wide.
This means that:
-the assignments were done excellently
-student is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly, shows creativity in solving tasks
- can perform simple laboratory measurements and experiments independently
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student can apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed, eventually brings up new subject of interest
The student writes in comprehensible English on the whole and shows some awareness of the norms for scientific writing; references to source materials are included.
Student's English is mainly formal and clear; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently, source materials are adequately paraphrased.
Student's English is mainly formal and accurate; reports meet norms for scientific writing, references to source materials are incorporated consistently and in a variety of ways, source materials are adequately paraphrased.
Mika Nieminen
English
27.08.2019 - 03.12.2019
10.06.2019 - 01.09.2019
3 cr
19IENVE
25 - 35
Taru Owston, Emmanuel Abruquah
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Tuukka Tonteri
English
17.08.2020 - 24.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 40
Seija Haapamäki, Tuukka Tonteri
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Hilda Szabo
English
17.08.2020 - 21.10.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
30 - 32
D.P. in Energy and Environmental Engineering Virtuaalihenkilö, Seija Haapamäki, Hilda Szabo
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Jari Puranen
English
17.08.2020 - 31.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 35
Sampo Saari, Jari Puranen
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Eeva Sundström
English
17.08.2020 - 24.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
5 cr
17IDEE
20 - 25
Kalle Tammi, Eeva Sundström
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Tiiti Kämäri
English
21.10.2020 - 24.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
3 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
30 - 35
D.P. in Energy and Environmental Engineering Virtuaalihenkilö, Tiiti Kämäri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Sakari Lepola
English
31.08.2020 - 24.12.2020
15.07.2020 - 30.08.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 35
Sakari Lepola
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Kai Hintsanen
English
17.08.2020 - 21.10.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
3 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
30 - 35
Kai Hintsanen, Tuukka Tonteri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Eeva-Leena Tuominen
Materials are published digitally. Suggested reading for project management Horine, G.2005 Absolute Beginner's Guide to Project Management
Introductory lectures on project work, work in the project group
Evaluation focuses on the actual working in the project, and on its documentation. Evaluation is based on continuous observation during project work, individual and group reflection on the work, evaluation discussion in the end of the project and the client's feedback. Also the project plan and project report are used in evaluation.
Finnish
English
01.08.2020 - 11.12.2020
02.07.2020 - 04.09.2020
5 cr
20KVIENVE
18I575B
18LATE
18I111
18I131
18I228K
18I190
18I160
18IDEE
18IM
18I575A
Konetekniikka Virtuaalihenkilö, Jukka Tohu, Anne Ojala, Kaisa Lahti, Harri Laaksonen, Perttu Arminen, Marita Hiipakka, Maarit Korhonen, Jarkko Peltonen, Laboratoriotekniikka Virtuaalihenkilö, Tiiti Kämäri, Manne Viljamaa, Metsätalous Virtuaalihenkilö, Piia Kanto, Tuukka Tonteri, Urpo Rossi
The course is based on realizing multiprofessional projects in working life and coaching project groups.
Laboratory Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
5 cr
0-5
The course is implemented through true working life projects.
No exams
Some projects use English as working language or have international dimensions.
1 op ~ 27 study hours.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
The group does not have clear rules, the work proceeds mostly due to the coach's or clients activity. Project leader does not take responsibility on leading. Time and work management, and control is inadequate.
Members of project group focus on their own sub-tasks, co-operation between group members and with the client, and utilization of the group members' special skills is inadequate. Work load is unevenly divided between the group members. Project outcome is incomplete, or group's and client's judgement of the outcome differs significantly.
Group agrees on the rules with the assistance of coach, and mainly follows the agreed rules during the project. Project leader takes responsibility on the progress of the project, and takes care that each member can participate in the project work.
Group members work according to the agreed rules and project leader's guidelines. They listen to each other's opinions and co-operate with the client. Project members' commitment to the project varies in different phases.
Project outcome is in accordance with the task description. Group and client have quite similar opinions on the quality of the project work and its outcomes.
Group self-directively and collectively agrees on the rules and takes care that all group members follow them during the project.
The project leader takes appropriate responsibility, takes the group members' skills into account and leads the project with smoothly. Project leader finds creative solutions to enhanche good working atmosphere. Time and work load allocation is systematical and balanced.
Each group member works for accomplishing the project aims in co-operation with group members. All group members participate actively in all phases of the project. Group members listen to and respect others' opinions and competences. Group members co-operate with the client and adjust plans according to feed-back.
Project proceeds according to the timetable or the timetable (and or the aims) is adjusted in co-operation with the client. The project group is able to evaluate realistically the quality of outcome with regard to the project aims and is able to reflect the project work process.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
Tuukka Tonteri
English
17.08.2020 - 24.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
5 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 40
Eero Kulmala, Aki Korpela, Sakari Lepola, Tuukka Tonteri, Perttu Arminen
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Eeva-Liisa Viskari
English
17.08.2020 - 24.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
3 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
25 - 35
Marileena Mäkelä
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Silja Kostia
English
19.10.2020 - 24.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
3 cr
18IDEE
30 - 35
Marja-Liisa Timperi, Tiiti Kämäri, Tuukka Tonteri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Hilda Szabo
English
17.08.2020 - 24.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
5 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
30 - 35
Seija Haapamäki, Hilda Szabo, Tiiti Kämäri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Bachelor of Engineering, EQF 6
General admission criteria, please see TAMK’s website.
It is possible for students to have their prior competence recognised.
See TAMK’s credit transfer guidelines
Completion of Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering curriculum studies and achievement of related competence objectives. The amount and quality of the natural sciences studies fulfill the requirements of the FEANI (European Federation of National Engineering Associations).
Further information:
TAMK Degree Regulations
Ministry of Education and Culture (in Finnish)
The degree is a Bachelor's Degree -level professional higher education degree.
The degree complies with the criteria set by the Finnish national degree system as well as with the European framework for degrees and other competences.
Ministry of Education and Culture
This degree programme is designed to educate internationally oriented environmental engineering professionals who are needed in private sector, public administration and NGOs.
After graduating as Bachelor of Engineering you will:
• Be able to plan and implement surveys and field studies involving environmental monitoring and remediation, form conclusions and make suggestions for further actions.
• Be able to steer the processes of industrial and public production and services in a sustainable manner.
• Have skills and competence to construct and develop quality, environmental and sustainability management systems for organisations.
• Know how to monitor emissions into air, water and soil, treat and monitor contaminated soils, wastewater or water, and carry out environmental sampling and analyses in field and laboratory.
Studying in a truly international atmosphere gives you unique possibilities to gain the confidence to work in different working environments, both as a team member and independently, all around the world.
In the optional professional studies, you can achieve advanced knowledge and skills for working towards your personal career goals in any of the following sectors: environmental forensics and consulting, energy technology and management, logistics and environment, and business management and entrepreneurship.
STRUCTURE OF STUDIES
The Energy and Environmental Engineering Degree Programme consists of the following parts:
Our graduates typically work in consulting companies engaged in projects requiring skills in environmental monitoring and soil remediation. Other examples include titles like environmental coordinator and environmental manager. Field of employers interested in our graduates is diverse, ranging from everywhere between regional and state environmental administrations, private companies and NGOs.
After the graduation, you will be eligible to apply for Master’s Degree programmes in Finland or abroad.
Assessment of study performances is based on TAMK’s assessment criteria
The detailed assessment criteria can be found in course implementation plans. The teaching and assessment methods are agreed on with students at the beginning of each course.
TAMK Degree Regulations
Completion of studies and achievement of competence objectives in the extent set by the curriculum.
Day time teaching
The Ministry of Education and Culture’ definitions of policy and TAMK’s strategy have been considered in the curriculum.
The Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering is continuously developed based on the feedback from the students, alumni and other stakeholders.
