Please select the curriculum by the start year of studies and orientation line.
Timo Parkkinen
English
01.01.2021 - 31.12.2021
01.12.2020 - 18.01.2021
15 cr
17IDEE
Taru Owston, Environmental Engineering Virtuaalihenkilö, Marja Oksanen, Seija Haapamäki, Hilda Szabo, Noora Markkanen, Silja Kostia, Tiiti Kämäri, Matti Karlsson
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
15 cr
0-5
Tuukka Tonteri
Keijzer et al. 2006. In situ soil and groundwater remediation: theory and practice. Tauw, the Netherlands
Lecture materials and literature related to the subject.
Lectures, exercises, weakly assignments, group discussions, field work (sampling), field- and laboratory measurements, group exam.
Assessment of the course is based on weekly assignments (10 pcs, 60 %) and final report (40 %). In order to pass the course, all assignments have to be returned. There are deadlines for all assignments, if assignments are after the given deadlines, it will have an effect on the final grade.
Self-evaluation and group evaluation are mandatory parts of the course and shall be returned to teachers as instructed by the end of the course. In addition, all fieldwork exercises are a mandatory part of the course.
English
01.09.2020 - 24.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 40
Seija Haapamäki, Hilda Szabo, Tuukka Tonteri
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
If you have work experience from contaminated soils and groundwater, you have a possibility to negotiate for alternative ways to complete the course. Also, if you have taken a course with a similar kind of content, please contact the teachers.
Contact lessons and laboratory exercises 50 hours
Self-study (reports, exercises, exam) 58 hours
Total 108 hours
Please note that the allocation for independent study is more than half of the time allocated to the course, so this requires significant self-study input.
Competences required have not been achieved in a sufficient level and/or indicators of the competences are missing: Participation on the course activities, assignments and reports are deficient, belated or missing. Achieved competence in design, study and report contaminated soil project have not been shown with sufficient input and knowledge and understanding of the core concepts and phenomena are not proven.
Achieved competence in design, study and report contaminated soil project is sufficient, but narrow. Knowledge and understanding of the core concepts and phenomena, like fate and transport of chemicals in soil, analysis methods, remediation methods are mainly adopted. Basic skills in soil sampling, site investigation, analysis and reporting and ability to do the analyses in practise when instructed and supervised. Basic theoretical knowledge and understanding in geotechnical engineering and soil pollution.
Achieved competence in design, study and report contaminated soil project is structured and applied. Fluent knowledge and understanding of the core concepts and phenomena, like fate and transport of chemicals in soil, analysis methods, remediation methods. Sufficient skills and ability in independent soil sampling, site investigation, analysis and reporting and ability to do the analyses in practise. Fluent theoretical knowledge and understanding in geotechnical engineering and soil pollution.
Achieved competence is wide, creative and developing. Fluent knowledge and understanding of the core concepts and phenomena like fate and transport of chemicals in soil, analysis methods, remediation methods. In addition, ability to apply the knowledge in new situations. Sufficient skills and understanding in independent soil sampling, site investigation, analysis and reporting and ability to make suggestions for developing and/or improving these methods. Fluent theoretical knowledge and understanding in geotechnical engineering and soil pollution and positive attitude to develop oneself in these fields.
Hilda Szabo
English
24.08.2020 - 21.10.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
30 - 32
Environmental Engineering Virtuaalihenkilö, Seija Haapamäki, Hilda Szabo
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Hilda Szabo
Course material is informed in TuniMoodle. Partly it will be literature or internet based material, partly teacher’s own material and partly material made by student’s work groups during the course.
Lectures
Basic training of the IR-photographing
Calculation program (Excel-version) of energy usage with different kind of buildings
Exercises and pair/group works
End of the course –exam
Evaluation of the exam, 0 to 5
Returned exercises
Activeness in lessons and group works
End of the course –exam
English
11.01.2021 - 30.04.2021
01.12.2020 - 17.01.2021
4 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
Sakari Lepola
IMPORTANT IMPORTATION
The Finnish Covernment has given several new orders because of the current Corona virus (Covid19) pandemia. The situation forces the university to make some changes to contact lessons as well as the type and the form of exercise(s) and the exam of this course. The basic principle of the course will be still the same, but we have to use innovative methods to fullfill the course and to make the end of the course exam.
No changes has been made to any other text in this plan, this text explains all the necessary changes which will happen between the middle of March - the end of the course.
Sakari Lepola
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Participating the lessons is mandatory in the beginning of the course, when practising IR- photographing and when making and presenting the pair and/or group seminars. Participating the lessons is very useful, when practicing the Excel -calculating programme.
The exam of the course will be carried out in the end of the course. The exact day will be clear during the end section of the course.
This course is very good possibility to build up international connections with other participants from different countries and from multicultural backgrounds.
Contact lessons in this course some 30-40 hours. Additional seminar work with own group 10-15 hours and one possible excursion, which takes app. one working day.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is normal, some absences are possible. The minimum requirement is to fully participate to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is good, some absences are possible. Student participates actively to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam with good marks.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is good, some absences are possible. Student participates actively to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam with excellent marks.
Hilda Szabo
English
11.01.2021 - 31.03.2021
01.12.2020 - 11.01.2021
3 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
Hilda Szabo, Mia O´Neill
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Hilda Szabo
English
01.01.2021 - 31.03.2021
01.12.2020 - 17.01.2021
4 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
Tiiti Kämäri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Jari Puranen
Lecture material in moodle.tuni.fi
Online resources
Contact teaching OR online teaching
Measurement work (if possible)
Co-operative and independent studying
Computer simulation modelling work
Guidance with video material
Written reports
Assessment is based on measurement and modelling work, reporting and exam
Weighting:
Noise measurements and modelling , report 40%
Air quality monitoring, report 40%
(Exam 20% there is no exam for the noise modelling portion of the course)
English
02.09.2020 - 31.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 06.09.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 35
Jari Puranen, Roope Siikanen
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Classes: 24h
Independent modelling work 36 h
Independent self study, measurements and reporting 48h
Total 108 h
Missing reports.
Student is able to analyse simple noise and particle modelling cases both qualitatively and quantitatively. Student needs extra support to be able to complete given tasks. Exercises have been done, but results might be slightly erroneous or conclusions are incomplete. Student might have trouble following given deadlines.
Student is able to use correct terminology and presents justified qualitative and quantitative analysis. Exercises are done completely, and results and analysis are correct. Results are at least briefly commented. Student doesn't fully understand the meaning or limitations of simulations.
Student shows the ability to do versatile qualitative and quantitative analysis. Student has a realistic knowledge of the limitations of the theoretical framework. Reports are comprehensive and well-structured. Student is able to clearly show his or her own conclusions related to the results, applications and legislation.
Eeva Sundström
Lecture slides and other materials will be available in Moodle course.
Other materials:
Ebert, J I 2007, Chapter 3: Photogrammetry, Photointerpretation, and Digital Imaging and Mapping in Environmental Forensics, in: Murphy, B, & Morrison, R, Introduction To Environmental Forensics, Amsterdam: Academic Press. Available in the library's eBook Collection (EBSCOhost).
contact teaching
Wise, S. 2013 GIS Fundamentals
Heywood, Sarah Cornelius and Steve Carver. An introduction to geographical information systems. Harlow : Prentice Hall, 2002.
QGIS Help
QGIS videos in You Tube
The teaching methods include contact teaching, distance teaching, GIS exercises, GIS coursework (individual), drone exercise, collecting GPS- data, course exam. The exam will be carried out by solving spatial data management tasks in QGIS. The exam will contain also some questions concerning remote sensing issues
Exam 50% : Open computer/book Moodle exam executed at TAMK in adp classroom by using QGIS, assessment grades1-5
Course work 30 %: compulsory, assessment grades 1-5
Remote sensing (drone mapping, laser scanned data) issues will cover 20% of the whole grade, questions will be included in the GIS Moodle exam.
English
17.08.2020 - 18.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 01.09.2020
5 cr
17IDEE
20 - 25
Kalle Tammi, Eeva Sundström
The QGIS will be the tool used in the course. It is an open source software freely available in internet
Link for downloading in Moodle.
Point cloud visualisation and analysis by CloudCompare (open source software).
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
The course exercises are related to the skills that environmental engineers commonly need in their working life.
14.12.2020 Moodle exam, carried out in adp class F1-31/remote?
18.12.2020 Retake, Moodle exam, carried out in adp class F1-31 or B2-22/remote? (not translated)
Contact teaching and guided computer excercises approximately 50 h, self-study and excercises approximately 85 h. Total approximately 135 h.
Remote Sensing data, aerial images, satellite images, laser scanning (point cloud) data
Drone mapping
Coordinate systems
Satellite positioning
Open file data and download services
Spatial data models, database management, visualization and thematic maps, searching functions, data entry, elementary proximity and overlay analysis
Environmental observations/change observations based on laser scanning and drone data
The student does not reach the level of satisfactory or does not do the exam neither the reports
The student can:
- download open file spatial data
- do the coordinate definitions
- separate vector and raster data from each others
- edit the appearance of the map objects and make thematic maps
- search map objects and save the results as separate files (layers)
- save and transfer data with gps device
- enter gps data into GIS
- explain the properties of aerial/satellite images and point cloud data
The student can in addition to previous mentioned:
- edit map objects and update attribute data
- utilize searching functions for efficient use of spatial data
- produce vector data
- rectify raster images
- maintain data of different coordinate systems gps data included
- visualise remote sensing data
The student can apply previous mentioned skills and elementary analysis tools in problem solving.
Hilda Szabo
Lecture material and links in moodle.
Lectures (minimum 75 % attendance required)
Assignments, group work and seminars
Discussions and meetings (memorandums of meetings required)
Co-operation and consultancy with students of construction architecture within their "study project 1".
Course 2021:
Divisions of evaluation:
- consulting 40 - 45 %
- participation plan 30 - 35 %
- lecture exercises 15 - 20 %
- activity and attendance at lectures (verified via zoom attendance listing) 5 - 10%
However, a student cannot receive a grade of 5 if he or she has significant absences from meetings and lectures.
Students in the same group can receive different grades based on their individual course performance.
English
11.01.2021 - 14.03.2021
01.12.2020 - 17.01.2021
3 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
Eveliina Asikainen, Minna Nyström-Järvinen
Moodle key will be given during the first lecture
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No alternative ways
-
No exam
International course, lectures given in English
Student's work load is 81 hours
Course schedule will be published during the first lecture
Student did not participate in the group work or lectures or the student participated in the group work and lectures, but the achieved competence is insufficient. This means that the student is not familiar with the basic concepts related to principles of zoning or participation process.
Student participated in the group work and in lectures. The achieved competence is sufficient but narrow.
Student shows throughout the course (assignments, classroom discussions) that is familiar with the basic concepts and phenomena related to the zoning of participation process.
The group work was done, reported and presented within the deadline but background information minimal, reporting structured according to the instructions but literature references are missing, presentation incomplete, discussion and conclusions are inadequate showing only narrow competence achieved.
Student participated in the group work and in lectures. The achieved competence is structured and student can apply the theoretical knowledge in known situations.
Student knows and understands the basic concepts and phenomena related to zoning and participation process. Student is motivated towards the subjects discussed.
The group work was done, reported and presented properly and within the deadline, background information collected, reporting has been structured according to the instructions , with references to the reliable sources, presentation of the results mostly correct eventually with small mistakes, discussion and conclusions are adequate showing deep understanding of the concepts and ability to apply them.
Student participated in the group work and in lectures. The achieved competence is wide and student can apply the theoretical knowledge in know and new situation.
Student has fluent knowledge and understanding the basic concepts and phenomena related to zoning and participation process. Student is motivated towards the subjects discussed, shows creativity and has a positive attitude towards developing itself.
The group work was done, reported and presented very well and within the deadline, background information collected, reporting has been structured according to the instructions , with references to the reliable sources, presentation correct, discussion and conclusions are adequate and based on comparison to literature, conclusions are clear and clearly expressed. The work shows deep understanding of the concepts and that the student has sufficient skills to apply correctly the theoretical knowledge.
Handouts ( and exercises) and additional material posted in Moodle
Books: Karen Timberlake & William Timberlake: Basic Chemistry, Pearson international edition
- Online teaching
- exercises
- self study
- assignments
- laboratory exercises
- reporting
- exam
The course grade will form according to the points collected as follows:
- 3-5 short assignments (max 3 points/assignment), containing the home exercises
- 3-4 laboratory reports (max 5 points/report)
- Exam max. X points
Before starting the laboratories each student has to take a safety exam
Grading:
grade 0: <50% of max scores
grade 1: 50-60% of max scores
grade 2: 60-70% of max scores
grade 3: 70-80% of max scores
grade 4: 80-90% of max scores
grade 5: >90% of max scores
English
22.03.2021 - 31.05.2021
25.11.2020 - 17.01.2021
5 cr
21KVTBIOT
Kaisa Lahti
Moodle is used as the information channel of the course.
Bioproduct Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Exam 21.5.2021
Retakes will be agreed later.
- Contact lessons 32 h
- Laboratory exercises 16 h
- Self-study
- Exam
Theory:
- basics of analytical chemistry
- acids and bases
- oxidation and reduction
- gravimetric analysis
- Spectrometric analysis
- Laboratory Safety
Laboratory:
- Laboratory safety and some working methods
- titration
- Gravimetric labwork
- Spectrometric labwork
The student may not have taken the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and not participated in all laboratory work. Laboratory report/reports or homework are not returned. Student may not have participated in the exams.
Overall the achieved competence is insufficient.
The student took the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. All the reports and homework are returned. Student participated in the exams.
Overall the achieved competence is sufficient but narrow.
The student took the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. All the reports and homework are returned. Student participated in the exams. Overall the achieved competence is structural.
The student took the safety exam before starting the laboratory work and participated in the laboratory work and did the laboratory reports. All the reports and homework are returned on time. Student participated in the exams with good results. Student has shown activity during the lesson. Overall the achieved competence is wide.
Hilda Szabo
English
08.03.2021 - 31.07.2021
07.02.2022 - 28.03.2022
15 cr
18IDEE
Environmental Engineering Virtuaalihenkilö, Hilda Szabo, Noora Markkanen
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Timo Parkkinen
English
01.01.2021 - 31.07.2021
01.12.2020 - 18.01.2021
15 cr
17IDEE
Environmental Engineering Virtuaalihenkilö, Hilda Szabo, Tiiti Kämäri
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Tiiti Kämäri
English
21.10.2020 - 11.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 04.10.2020
3 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
30 - 35
Tiiti Kämäri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Sakari Lepola
Course material is informed in Tabula. Partly it will be literature or internet based material, partly teacher’s own material and partly material made by student’s work groups during the course.
Lectures
Exercises and pair works or group works /seminars
End of the course –exam
Returned exercises
Activeness in lessons and group works
End of the course –exam, evaluation of the exam, 0 to 5
English
01.09.2020 - 24.12.2020
15.07.2020 - 30.08.2020
4 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 35
Sakari Lepola
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Participating the lessons is useful in any case and it is absolutely necessary, when making and presenting the pair works and/or group seminars. Active participation in group work is obligatory in this course.
The exam of the course will be carried out in the end of the course. The exact day will be clear during the end section of the course.
This course is very good possibility to build up international connections with other participants from different countries and from multicultural backgrounds.
Contact lessons in this course some 30-40 hours. Additional seminar work with own group 10-15 hours and one possible excursion, which takes app. one working day.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is normal, some absences are possible. The minimum requirement is to fully participate to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is good, some absences are possible. Student participates actively to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam with good marks.
Student’s motivation to participate to the lectures is good, some absences are possible. Student participates actively to the seminar work of the own group. Student passes the written or otherwise arranged exam with excellent marks.
Hilda Szabo
English
08.03.2021 - 31.07.2021
07.02.2022 - 28.03.2022
15 cr
18IDEE
Environmental Engineering Virtuaalihenkilö, Hilda Szabo, Noora Markkanen
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Timo Parkkinen
English
01.01.2021 - 31.07.2021
01.12.2020 - 18.01.2021
15 cr
17IDEE
Environmental Engineering Virtuaalihenkilö, Hilda Szabo, Tiiti Kämäri
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Taru Owston
Materials shared in Moodle.
Interactive work in the Moodle environment and/or taking part in activities related to the study programme.
The grade is given based on... (to be agreed)
English
03.09.2020 - 02.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 10.09.2020
3 cr
18IDEE
30 - 35
Taru Owston
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Accomplishments in work life shared with the other students.
The course supports the students in their worklife projects.
Electronic/Moodle Examination taken in a time convinient for the student.
International group
Tasks in Moodle.
)
Tasks are not completed or are plagiarised.
Tasks are completed. Can understand sentences and frequently used expressions related to areas of
most immediate relevance (e.g. very basic personal and family information,
shopping, local geography, employment). Can communicate in simple and
routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of information on
familiar and routine matters. Can describe in simple terms aspects of his/her
background, immediate environment and matters related to studies. Has made an effort on leading an online session.
Completes tasks as requested.Shows ability to differentiate between different text types.
Can understand the main ideas of complex text on both concrete and abstract topics, including technical discussions in his/her field of
specialisation. Can interact with a degree of fluency and spontaneity that
makes regular interaction with native speakers quite possible without strain
for either party. Can produce clear, detailed text on a wide range of subjects
and explain a viewpoint on a topical issue giving the advantages and disadvantages of various options.
Leads an online session that is clearly thought out and that achieves the goals set.
Completes tasks as requested. Shows ability to differentiate between different text types.
Can express him/herself
spontaneously, very fluently and precisely, differentiating finer shades of
meaning even in more complex situations.
Can understand a wide range of demanding, longer texts, and recognise
implicit meaning. Can express him/herself fluently and spontaneously
without much obvious searching for expressions. Can use language flexibly
and effectively for professional purposes. Can produce
clear, well-structured, detailed text on complex subjects, showing controlled
use of organisational patterns, connectors and cohesive devices.
Leads an online session that is clearly thought out and that achieves the goals set with excellence.
Kai Hintsanen
English
17.08.2020 - 21.10.2020
18.07.2020 - 02.09.2020
3 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
30 - 35
Kai Hintsanen, Tuukka Tonteri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Eeva-Liisa Viskari
Materials are published digitally. Suggested reading for project management Horine, G.2005 Absolute Beginner's Guide to Project Management
Introductory lectures on project work, work in the project group
Evaluation focuses on the actual working in the project, and on its documentation. Evaluation is based on continuous observation during project work, individual and group reflection on the work, evaluation discussion in the end of the project and the client's feedback. Also the project plan and project report are used in evaluation.
Finnish
English
17.08.2020 - 24.12.2020
20.04.2020 - 03.09.2020
5 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
30 - 35
The course is based on realizing multiprofessional projects in working life and coaching project groups.
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
The course is implemented through true working life projects.
No exams
Some projects use English as working language or have international dimensions.
1 op ~ 27 study hours.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
The group does not have clear rules, the work proceeds mostly due to the coach's or clients activity. Project leader does not take responsibility on leading. Time and work management, and control is inadequate.
Members of project group focus on their own sub-tasks, co-operation between group members and with the client, and utilization of the group members' special skills is inadequate. Work load is unevenly divided between the group members. Project outcome is incomplete, or group's and client's judgement of the outcome differs significantly.
Group agrees on the rules with the assistance of coach, and mainly follows the agreed rules during the project. Project leader takes responsibility on the progress of the project, and takes care that each member can participate in the project work.
Group members work according to the agreed rules and project leader's guidelines. They listen to each other's opinions and co-operate with the client. Project members' commitment to the project varies in different phases.
Project outcome is in accordance with the task description. Group and client have quite similar opinions on the quality of the project work and its outcomes.
Group self-directively and collectively agrees on the rules and takes care that all group members follow them during the project.
The project leader takes appropriate responsibility, takes the group members' skills into account and leads the project with smoothly. Project leader finds creative solutions to enhanche good working atmosphere. Time and work load allocation is systematical and balanced.
Each group member works for accomplishing the project aims in co-operation with group members. All group members participate actively in all phases of the project. Group members listen to and respect others' opinions and competences. Group members co-operate with the client and adjust plans according to feed-back.
Project proceeds according to the timetable or the timetable (and or the aims) is adjusted in co-operation with the client. The project group is able to evaluate realistically the quality of outcome with regard to the project aims and is able to reflect the project work process.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
Maarit Korhonen
Materials are published digitally. Suggested reading for project management Horine, G.2005 Absolute Beginner's Guide to Project Management
Introductory lectures on project work, work in the project group
Evaluation focuses on the actual working in the project, and on its documentation. Evaluation is based on continuous observation during project work, individual and group reflection on the work, evaluation discussion in the end of the project and the client's feedback. Also the project plan and project report are used in evaluation.
Finnish
English
01.09.2020 - 18.12.2020
04.06.2020 - 18.09.2020
5 cr
20KVIENVE
18I575B
18LATE
18I111
18I131
18I228K
18I190
18I160
18IDEE
18IM
18I575A
Jukka Tohu, Mika Ijas, Anne Ojala, Erkki Kiviniemi, Kaisa Lahti, Mari Oja, Harri Laaksonen, Atte Rättyä, Perttu Arminen, Marita Hiipakka, Maarit Korhonen, Jarkko Peltonen, Matti Kivimäki, Tiiti Kämäri, Juha Hurmalainen, Manne Viljamaa, Piia Kanto, Tuukka Tonteri, Iina Nieminen, Urpo Rossi
The course is based on realizing multiprofessional projects in working life and coaching project groups.
Laboratory Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
5 cr
0-5
The course is implemented through true working life projects.
No exams
Some projects use English as working language or have international dimensions.
1 op ~ 27 study hours.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
The group does not have clear rules, the work proceeds mostly due to the coach's or clients activity. Project leader does not take responsibility on leading. Time and work management, and control is inadequate.
Members of project group focus on their own sub-tasks, co-operation between group members and with the client, and utilization of the group members' special skills is inadequate. Work load is unevenly divided between the group members. Project outcome is incomplete, or group's and client's judgement of the outcome differs significantly.
Group agrees on the rules with the assistance of coach, and mainly follows the agreed rules during the project. Project leader takes responsibility on the progress of the project, and takes care that each member can participate in the project work.
Group members work according to the agreed rules and project leader's guidelines. They listen to each other's opinions and co-operate with the client. Project members' commitment to the project varies in different phases.
Project outcome is in accordance with the task description. Group and client have quite similar opinions on the quality of the project work and its outcomes.
Group self-directively and collectively agrees on the rules and takes care that all group members follow them during the project.
The project leader takes appropriate responsibility, takes the group members' skills into account and leads the project with smoothly. Project leader finds creative solutions to enhanche good working atmosphere. Time and work load allocation is systematical and balanced.
Each group member works for accomplishing the project aims in co-operation with group members. All group members participate actively in all phases of the project. Group members listen to and respect others' opinions and competences. Group members co-operate with the client and adjust plans according to feed-back.
Project proceeds according to the timetable or the timetable (and or the aims) is adjusted in co-operation with the client. The project group is able to evaluate realistically the quality of outcome with regard to the project aims and is able to reflect the project work process.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
Erkki Kiviniemi
Materials are published digitally. Suggested reading for project management Horine, G.2005 Absolute Beginner's Guide to Project Management
Introductory lectures on project work, work in the project group
Evaluation focuses on the actual working in the project, and on its documentation. Evaluation is based on continuous observation during project work, individual and group reflection on the work, evaluation discussion in the end of the project and the client's feedback. Also the project plan and project report are used in evaluation.
Finnish
English
01.01.2021 - 30.05.2021
02.12.2020 - 11.01.2021
5 cr
19AI112S
Tomi-Pekka Nieminen, Erkki Kiviniemi, Sakari Lepola
The course is based on realizing multiprofessional projects in working life and coaching project groups.
School of Industrial Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
The course is implemented through true working life projects.
No exams
Some projects use English as working language or have international dimensions.
1 op ~ 27 study hours.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
The group does not have clear rules, the work proceeds mostly due to the coach's or clients activity. Project leader does not take responsibility on leading. Time and work management, and control is inadequate.
Members of project group focus on their own sub-tasks, co-operation between group members and with the client, and utilization of the group members' special skills is inadequate. Work load is unevenly divided between the group members. Project outcome is incomplete, or group's and client's judgement of the outcome differs significantly.
Group agrees on the rules with the assistance of coach, and mainly follows the agreed rules during the project. Project leader takes responsibility on the progress of the project, and takes care that each member can participate in the project work.
Group members work according to the agreed rules and project leader's guidelines. They listen to each other's opinions and co-operate with the client. Project members' commitment to the project varies in different phases.
Project outcome is in accordance with the task description. Group and client have quite similar opinions on the quality of the project work and its outcomes.
Group self-directively and collectively agrees on the rules and takes care that all group members follow them during the project.
The project leader takes appropriate responsibility, takes the group members' skills into account and leads the project with smoothly. Project leader finds creative solutions to enhanche good working atmosphere. Time and work load allocation is systematical and balanced.
Each group member works for accomplishing the project aims in co-operation with group members. All group members participate actively in all phases of the project. Group members listen to and respect others' opinions and competences. Group members co-operate with the client and adjust plans according to feed-back.
Project proceeds according to the timetable or the timetable (and or the aims) is adjusted in co-operation with the client. The project group is able to evaluate realistically the quality of outcome with regard to the project aims and is able to reflect the project work process.
Project can be evaluated as failed because of following reasons
- the coach has been responsible for all communication with the client
- project group has not had any documented meetings
- project group has not written a project plan and/or project report
- project group has not evaluated the process and outcome of the project
Hilda Szabo
English
10.01.2021 - 31.05.2021
01.12.2020 - 11.01.2021
5 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
Juha Mettälä
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Tuukka Tonteri
Material available in Tabula. In addition recommended reading:
IEA. 2016. World Energy Outlook 2016. Executive summary.
OECD/IEA & FAO. 2017. How2Guide for Bioenergy. Roadmap Development and Implementation. IEA Publications.
The course consists of lectures by different professionals who present different renewable energy technologies. The course includes contact teaching, assignments and an exam.
The quality of assignments, exam and participation.
English
01.09.2020 - 24.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 30.08.2020
5 cr
20KVIENVE
17IDEE
25 - 40
Eero Kulmala, Aki Korpela, Sakari Lepola, Tuukka Tonteri, Perttu Arminen
Built Environment and Bioeconomy
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
No alternative ways to complete the course. Participation to the lectures is an important part of the implementation.
There will be four small exams during the course. Dates will be given during the course.
International study group
40h of contact teaching, 95h individual learning
Some of the assignments not submitted or accepted and / or the achieved competence is insufficient. Participation is not sufficient.
All assignments are accepted. Achieved competence is sufficient, but narrow. Participation to the lectures is weak.
All assignments are accepted or well done. Achieved competence represents fluent understanding on the core concepts, renewable energy technologies and processes. Participation to the lectures is good.
All assignments are well done. Achieved competence represents excellent understanding on the core concepts, renewable energy technologies and processes. Participation to the lectures is very good.
Hilda Szabo
English
07.09.2020 - 20.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 16.08.2020
3 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
25 - 35
Hilda Szabo, Marileena Mäkelä
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Silja Kostia
English
19.10.2020 - 18.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 10.10.2020
3 cr
18IDEE
30 - 35
Marja-Liisa Timperi, Tiiti Kämäri, Tuukka Tonteri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Knowledge and understanding of the core concepts, processes and phenomena of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Student has basic skills in water sampling and study of basic physico-chemical and biological parameters of freshwater and ability to do the analyses in practise when instructed and supervised. Basic theoretical knowledge and understanding in limnology, forestry and bioindicator studies.
Student manages the assigned tasks under supervision and is able to do routine operations. Student knows courses of action but cannot necessarily justify his/her choices.
Student can give and receive feedback and can work in a group. Student is able to consider and assess the topics from his/her viewpoint. Student takes responsibility for his/her own work. Student can describe sustainability related effects of his/her own work related to structure and function of ecosystems.
Student is able to apply, explain and compare the basic concepts, processes and phenomena of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Student has sufficient skills and ability in independent water sampling and study of basic physico-chemical and biological parameters of freshwater and ability to do the analyses in practise independently. Student has fluent theoretical knowledge and understanding in limnology, forestry and bioindicator studies. Student is also able to structure things in relation to one another.
Motivation and interest towards the subject expressed clearly. Student can select the most appropriate course of action from different sampling or indicator options and justify his/her choices. In practice, this means that the student is able apply his/her skills and make plans accordingly. Student is able to limit tasks and solve problems during the course.
Student can give and receive feedback actively and constructively. Student is able to consider and assess the topics both from his/her and the close community’s viewpoint. Student can cooperate responsibly and is ready to develop his/her interaction skills. Student recognizes and follows the important courses of action in the field. Student takes responsibility and commits to the group activities in addition to his/her own work. Can describe and assess the sustainability related effects of his/her own work in relation to structure and function of ecosystems.
Student understands extensive entities and relations between them, and is able to generalize, analyze and relate ecological information to the professional context. Student has fluent knowledge and understanding of the basic concepts, processes and phenomena of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. In addition, the student is able to apply the knowledge in new situations. Sufficient skills and ability in independent water sampling and study of basic physico-chemical and biological parameters of freshwater and ability to do the analyses in practise independently. Ability to make suggestions for developing and/or improving these methods. Student has fluent theoretical knowledge and understanding in limnology, forestry and bioindicator studies.
Motivation and high interest towards the subject and developing oneself in these fields. Student can search for diverse courses of action and solution alternatives for ecological issues and sampling, justify his/her choices and try new courses of action. Student is also able to assess diverse alternatives, combine solution alternatives creatively or creates new ones.
Student uses feedback systematically as a professional growth tool in his/her own work and the community. Student considers and assesses himself/herself and his/her professional community or task. Student can cooperate responsibly, flexibly and constructively, and develops his/her own and the group’s interaction. Student works responsibly and in a committed manner considering the community and field requirements and needs. Student understands the sustainability related effects of his/her work and can anticipate them in his/her work in relation to contaminated site remediation.
Hilda Szabo
English
01.01.2021 - 31.05.2021
01.12.2020 - 17.01.2021
4 cr
20IENVE
Seija Haapamäki, Marja-Liisa Timperi, Tiiti Kämäri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering, Open University of Applied Sciences
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Opiskelija osaa kertoa pääosin ymmärrettävästi mutta lyhyesti ja yksipuolisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa. Opiskelija osaa hankkia ja ymmärtää oman alansa tietoa helppolukuisista lähteistä.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä yksinkertaisesti keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä selviytyy pääosin ymmärrettävästi tavallisimmista keskusteluista.
Opiskelija osaa toimia ennakoitavissa toimenkuvansa vaatimissa työelämäkontakteissa, esim. sähköisessä viestinnässä, puhelinviestinnässä, neuvontatilanteissa, palavereissa ja raportoinneissa.
Opiskelija osaa tulkita oman alansa yksinkertaisia ohjeistuksia ja laatia niitä pääosin ymmärrettävästi. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa keskeiset asiat koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään eheänä kokonaisuutena esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman alansa tietoa keskeisimmistä lähteistä ja seurata oman alansa kehitystä yleisellä tasolla.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä keskustella näistä aiheista.
Opiskelija osaa hoitaa keskeisimpiä toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköistä viestintää, puhelinviestintää, neuvontatilanteita, palavereja ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa laatia ja ymmärtää oman alansa ohjeistuksia melko hyvin. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa monipuolisesti ja tarkoituksenmukaisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa itsenäisesti ja monipuolisesti hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman alansa tietoa ja seurata alansa ammatillista kehitystä laaja-alaisesti.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä sujuvasti yritysten ja organisaatioiden toimintaa, tuotteita, prosesseja ja palveluita sekä keskustella aloitteellisesti näistä aiheista. Opiskelija osaa hoitaa vaivattomasti ja asianmukaisesti toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköistä viestintää, puhelinviestintää, neuvontatilanteita, palavereja ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa ymmärtää vaikeuksitta ja laatia selkeitä oman alansa ohjeistuksia. (not translated)
Reijo Mäkelä
07.01.2021 - 29.05.2021
02.12.2020 - 31.12.2020
2 cr
20AI231
0 - 40
Reijo Mäkelä
TARKEMMAT TIEDOT LÖYTYVÄT KIRJALLISEN TAIDON TOTEUTUKSESTA = Skriftlig färdighet (not translated)
Electrical and Automation Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Opiskelija osaa kertoa pääosin ymmärrettävästi mutta lyhyesti ja yksipuolisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa. Opiskelija osaa hankkia ja ymmärtää oman alansa tietoa helppolukuisista lähteistä.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä yksinkertaisesti keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä selviytyy pääosin ymmärrettävästi tavallisimmista keskusteluista.
Opiskelija osaa toimia ennakoitavissa toimenkuvansa vaatimissa työelämäkontakteissa, esim. sähköisessä viestinnässä, puhelinviestinnässä, neuvontatilanteissa, palavereissa ja raportoinneissa.
Opiskelija osaa tulkita oman alansa yksinkertaisia ohjeistuksia ja laatia niitä pääosin ymmärrettävästi. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa keskeiset asiat koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään eheänä kokonaisuutena esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman alansa tietoa keskeisimmistä lähteistä ja seurata oman alansa kehitystä yleisellä tasolla.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä keskustella näistä aiheista.
Opiskelija osaa hoitaa keskeisimpiä toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköistä viestintää, puhelinviestintää, neuvontatilanteita, palavereja ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa laatia ja ymmärtää oman alansa ohjeistuksia melko hyvin. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa monipuolisesti ja tarkoituksenmukaisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa itsenäisesti ja monipuolisesti hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman alansa tietoa ja seurata alansa ammatillista kehitystä laaja-alaisesti.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä sujuvasti yritysten ja organisaatioiden toimintaa, tuotteita, prosesseja ja palveluita sekä keskustella aloitteellisesti näistä aiheista. Opiskelija osaa hoitaa vaivattomasti ja asianmukaisesti toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköistä viestintää, puhelinviestintää, neuvontatilanteita, palavereja ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa ymmärtää vaikeuksitta ja laatia selkeitä oman alansa ohjeistuksia. (not translated)
Reijo Mäkelä
Joni Sallila: Protocall – Teknikbiten, Tammertekniikka 2016.
Ammattialakohtaiset tekstit ilmoitetaan kurssin aikana.
A. Lindgren: Pippi går ombord (not translated)
Etäopetus, harjoitukset, tentti, itsenäinen verkko-opiskelu, alkutesti (not translated)
Asteikko 0-5. Kielioppitesti (väh.) 30/50 pistettä. Kirjallinen ja suullinen koe. Opetuksen läsnäolovaatimus: 80 %. (not translated)
04.01.2021 - 29.05.2021
02.12.2020 - 31.12.2020
2 cr
20AI231
0 - 40
Reijo Mäkelä
Esitiedot Lukion ruotsi tai vastaava kielitaito. B1-tason kielitaito.
Oppimistavoitteet: Opiskelijalla on sellainen koulutusohjelman mukainen ruotsin kielen kirjallinen ja suullinen taito, joka ammatin harjoittamisen ja ammatillisen kehityksen kannalta on tarpeellinen.
Opiskelija selviytyy oman ammattialansa kirjallisista ja suullisista tehtävistä pohjoismaissa sekä kaksikielisellä alueella Suomessa.
Opiskelija osaa kertoa työympäristöstään sekä oman alansa toiminnoista.
Tieto virtuaalisuudesta opiskelijalle: Verkkototeutus. (not translated)
Electrical and Automation Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Näyttökoe (not translated)
Kielioppitesti 11.1.2021 - 31.1.2021
Kirjallinen koe: 16.04.2021
Suullinen koe: 23.04.2021 ja 30.04.2021
Uusinnoista ilmoitetaan keväällä 2021. (not translated)
4 opintopistettä=108 tuntia (not translated)
Kommunikaatiotilanteet: puhelin, s-posti, lentokenttä, tehdasalue, tapaaminen, ihmisten esittely toisilleen, tekniikan alat, tienneuvominen, kysyminen, taulukoista kertominen, asennusmanuaalien terminologiaa, vian etsiminen, hotellissa asuminen, tuotekuvaus, neuvottelu, tehdaskierros, ravintola.
Ammattialakohtaiset lisätekstit. Peruskieliopin kertaus + kielioppitesti. (not translated)
Opiskelija ei osaa kertoa koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa. Opiskelija ei osaa hankkia eikä ymmärrä oman tekniikan alansa tietoa helppolukuisista lähteistä.
Opiskelija ei osaa esitellä keskeisimpiä asioita yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista eikä selviydy ymmärrettävästi tavallisimmista keskusteluista.
Opiskelija ei osaa toimia ennakoitavissa toimenkuvansa vaatimissa työelämäkontakteissa. Opiskelija ei osaa laatia esim. sähköpostiviestejä, reklamaatioita tai raportteja.
Opiskelija ei osaa tulkita oman alansa yksinkertaisia teknisiä ohjeistuksia tai laatia niitä. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa pääosin ymmärrettävästi mutta lyhyesti ja yksipuolisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa. Opiskelija osaa hankkia ja ymmärtää oman tekniikan alansa tietoa helppolukuisista lähteistä.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä yksinkertaisesti keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä selviytyy pääosin ymmärrettävästi tavallisimmista keskusteluista.
Opiskelija osaa toimia ennakoitavissa toimenkuvansa vaatimissa työelämäkontakteissa, esim. sähköpostiviestit, reklamaatiot, puhelintilanteet ja raportoinnit.
Opiskelija osaa tulkita oman alansa yksinkertaisia teknisiä ohjeistuksia ja laatia niitä pääosin ymmärrettävästi. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa keskeiset asiat koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään eheänä kokonaisuutena esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman tekniikan alansa tietoa keskeisimmistä lähteistä ja seurata oman alansa kehitystä yleisellä tasolla.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä keskustella näistäaiheista.
Opiskelija osaa hoitaa keskeisimpiä toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköpostiviestejä, reklamaatioita, puhelintilanteita ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa laatia ja ymmärtää oman alansa teknisiä ohjeistuksia melko hyvin (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa monipuolisesti ja tarkoituksenmukaisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa itsenäisesti ja monipuolisesti hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman tekniikan alansa tietoa ja seurata alansa ammatillista kehitystä laaja-alaisesti.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä sujuvasti yritysten ja organisaatioiden toimintaa, tuotteita, prosesseja ja palveluita sekä keskustella aloitteellisesti näistä aiheista. Opiskelija osaa hoitaa vaivattomasti ja asianmukaisesti toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja,
esim. sähköpostiviestejä, reklamaatioita, puhelintilanteita ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa ymmärtää vaikeuksitta ja laatia selkeitä oman alansa teknisiä ohjeistuksia. (not translated)
Hilda Szabo
Handouts posted in Tabula
Textbook: George Tchobanoglous and Edward D. Schroeder: Water Quality
Contact teaching, field excursion, assignments, laboratory exercises, exam
The course consists of lectures and discussions, exercises, field excursion of which students write report, compulsory laboratory exercises (3) and exam.The final grade is calculated based on the achievments gained from assignments and the exam, quatlity of laboratory reports and activity and interest shown thrughout the course.
English
01.09.2020 - 20.12.2020
18.07.2020 - 23.08.2020
5 cr
20KVIENVE
18IDEE
30 - 35
Seija Haapamäki, Hilda Szabo, Tiiti Kämäri
Environmental Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Exam at the end of the course.
5 credits = 135 h of work
Concept of water and wastewater management, sources of water, use of water, characteristics of water and their significance from environmental health point of view, unit operations used in water and wastewater treatment, drinking water production, wastewater treatment, alternative wastewater management options and future perspectives.
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is insufficient.
This means that
-some of the assignments were done acceptably
-the student is not familiar with the basic concepts discussed during the course
-can perform the laboratory measurements and experiments under supervision
-has no basic skills in reporting the results of the measurements and experiments
-seldom and inactive participation in the lectures
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is sufficient but narrow.
This means that
-some of the assignments were done acceptably
-the student is familiar with the basic concepts discussed during the course but often makes mistakes when applying them
-can perform the laboratory measurements and experiments under supervision
-has basic skills in reporting the results of the measurements and experiments
-seldom and inactive participation in the lectures
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is structural.
This means that:
-most of the assignments were done and accepted
-exam shows that the student is familiar with the concepts discussed during the course and can apply them in most of the situations
-is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly
-can perform laboratory measurements and experiments independently
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student attends to apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed
Student participated in the laboratory exercises and the exam. Overall the achieved competence is wide.
This means that:
-the assignments were done excellently
-student is fluent in the basic concepts and phenomena related to the subjects discussed during the course
-can solve model exercise and new exercises correctly, shows creativity in solving tasks
- can perform simple laboratory measurements and experiments independently
-the reporting of the laboratory results shows that the student can apply the theoretical knowledge in explaining the results
-student is clearly motivated and interested in the subjects discussed, eventually brings up new subject of interest
Opiskelija osaa kertoa pääosin ymmärrettävästi mutta lyhyesti ja yksipuolisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa. Opiskelija osaa hankkia ja ymmärtää oman alansa tietoa helppolukuisista lähteistä.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä yksinkertaisesti keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä selviytyy pääosin ymmärrettävästi tavallisimmista keskusteluista.
Opiskelija osaa toimia ennakoitavissa toimenkuvansa vaatimissa työelämäkontakteissa, esim. sähköisessä viestinnässä, puhelinviestinnässä, neuvontatilanteissa, palavereissa ja raportoinneissa.
Opiskelija osaa tulkita oman alansa yksinkertaisia ohjeistuksia ja laatia niitä pääosin ymmärrettävästi. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa keskeiset asiat koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään eheänä kokonaisuutena esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman alansa tietoa keskeisimmistä lähteistä ja seurata oman alansa kehitystä yleisellä tasolla.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä keskustella näistä aiheista.
Opiskelija osaa hoitaa keskeisimpiä toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköistä viestintää, puhelinviestintää, neuvontatilanteita, palavereja ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa laatia ja ymmärtää oman alansa ohjeistuksia melko hyvin. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa monipuolisesti ja tarkoituksenmukaisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa itsenäisesti ja monipuolisesti hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman alansa tietoa ja seurata alansa ammatillista kehitystä laaja-alaisesti.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä sujuvasti yritysten ja organisaatioiden toimintaa, tuotteita, prosesseja ja palveluita sekä keskustella aloitteellisesti näistä aiheista. Opiskelija osaa hoitaa vaivattomasti ja asianmukaisesti toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköistä viestintää, puhelinviestintää, neuvontatilanteita, palavereja ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa ymmärtää vaikeuksitta ja laatia selkeitä oman alansa ohjeistuksia. (not translated)
Katri Kallinen
23.08.2021 - 17.12.2021
10.06.2021 - 01.09.2021
2 cr
20I231A
0 - 40
Katri Kallinen
Electrical and Automation Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
0-5
Opiskelija osaa kertoa pääosin ymmärrettävästi mutta lyhyesti ja yksipuolisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa. Opiskelija osaa hankkia ja ymmärtää oman alansa tietoa helppolukuisista lähteistä.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä yksinkertaisesti keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä selviytyy pääosin ymmärrettävästi tavallisimmista keskusteluista.
Opiskelija osaa toimia ennakoitavissa toimenkuvansa vaatimissa työelämäkontakteissa, esim. sähköisessä viestinnässä, puhelinviestinnässä, neuvontatilanteissa, palavereissa ja raportoinneissa.
Opiskelija osaa tulkita oman alansa yksinkertaisia ohjeistuksia ja laatia niitä pääosin ymmärrettävästi. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa keskeiset asiat koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään eheänä kokonaisuutena esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman alansa tietoa keskeisimmistä lähteistä ja seurata oman alansa kehitystä yleisellä tasolla.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä keskeisimmät asiat yritysten ja organisaatioiden toiminnasta, tuotteista, prosesseista ja palveluista sekä keskustella näistä aiheista.
Opiskelija osaa hoitaa keskeisimpiä toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköistä viestintää, puhelinviestintää, neuvontatilanteita, palavereja ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa laatia ja ymmärtää oman alansa ohjeistuksia melko hyvin. (not translated)
Opiskelija osaa kertoa monipuolisesti ja tarkoituksenmukaisesti koulutuksestaan, työkokemuksestaan ja -tehtävistään esim. työnhakutilanteessa.
Opiskelija osaa itsenäisesti ja monipuolisesti hankkia, käsitellä ja soveltaa oman alansa tietoa ja seurata alansa ammatillista kehitystä laaja-alaisesti.
Opiskelija osaa esitellä sujuvasti yritysten ja organisaatioiden toimintaa, tuotteita, prosesseja ja palveluita sekä keskustella aloitteellisesti näistä aiheista. Opiskelija osaa hoitaa vaivattomasti ja asianmukaisesti toimenkuvansa vaatimia työelämäkontakteja, esim. sähköistä viestintää, puhelinviestintää, neuvontatilanteita, palavereja ja raportointia.
Opiskelija osaa ymmärtää vaikeuksitta ja laatia selkeitä oman alansa ohjeistuksia. (not translated)
Katri Kallinen
23.08.2021 - 17.12.2021
10.06.2021 - 01.09.2021
2 cr
20I231A
0 - 40
Katri Kallinen
Electrical and Automation Engineering
Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering
TAMK Main Campus
1 cr
0-5
Bachelor of Engineering, EQF 6
General admission criteria, please see TAMK’s website.
It is possible for students to have their prior competence recognised.
See TAMK’s credit transfer guidelines
Completion of Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering curriculum studies and achievement of related competence objectives. The amount and quality of the natural sciences studies fulfill the requirements of the FEANI (European Federation of National Engineering Associations).
Further information:
TAMK Degree Regulations
Ministry of Education and Culture (in Finnish)
The degree is a Bachelor's Degree -level professional higher education degree.
The degree complies with the criteria set by the Finnish national degree system as well as with the European framework for degrees and other competences.
Ministry of Education and Culture
This degree programme is designed to educate internationally oriented environmental engineering professionals who are needed in private sector, public administration and NGOs.
After graduating as Bachelor of Engineering you will:
• Be able to plan and implement surveys and field studies involving environmental monitoring and remediation, form conclusions and make suggestions for further actions.
• Be able to steer the processes of industrial and public production and services in a sustainable manner.
• Have skills and competence to construct and develop quality, environmental and sustainability management systems for organisations.
• Know how to monitor emissions into air, water and soil, treat and monitor contaminated soils, wastewater or water, and carry out environmental sampling and analyses in field and laboratory.
Studying in a truly international atmosphere gives you unique possibilities to gain the confidence to work in different working environments, both as a team member and independently, all around the world.
In the optional professional studies, you can achieve advanced knowledge and skills for working towards your personal career goals in any of the following sectors: environmental forensics and consulting, energy technology and management, logistics and environment, and business management and entrepreneurship.
STRUCTURE OF STUDIES
The Energy and Environmental Engineering Degree Programme consists of the following parts:
Our graduates typically work in consulting companies engaged in projects requiring skills in environmental monitoring and soil remediation. Other examples include titles like environmental coordinator and environmental manager. Field of employers interested in our graduates is diverse, ranging from everywhere between regional and state environmental administrations, private companies and NGOs.
After the graduation, you will be eligible to apply for Master’s Degree programmes in Finland or abroad.
Assessment of study performances is based on TAMK’s assessment criteria
The detailed assessment criteria can be found in course implementation plans. The teaching and assessment methods are agreed on with students at the beginning of each course.
TAMK Degree Regulations
Completion of studies and achievement of competence objectives in the extent set by the curriculum.
Day time teaching
The Ministry of Education and Culture’ definitions of policy and TAMK’s strategy have been considered in the curriculum.
The Degree Programme in Energy and Environmental Engineering is continuously developed based on the feedback from the students, alumni and other stakeholders.